Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17623784›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Tomato MAPKs LeMPK1, LeMPK2, and LeMPK3 function in the systemin-mediated defense response against herbivorous insects.

Pramod Kaitheri Kandoth, Stefanie Ranf, Suchita S Pancholi, Sastry Jayanty, Michael D Walla, Wayne Miller, Gregg A Howe, David E Lincoln, Johannes W Stratmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 272 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Multi-omics analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genome-Wide Identification of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Silencing ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pramod Kaitheri KandothDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Stefanie Ranf
Suchita S Pancholi
Sastry Jayanty
Michael D Walla
Wayne Miller
Gregg A Howe
David E Lincoln
Johannes W Stratmann
University of South Carolina · USColorado State University · USLeibniz Association · DEMichigan State University · US

Funding

REGULATION OF DEFENSE SIGNALING IN TOMATOR01GM057795 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOWE, GREGG A · 1998 to 2012
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057795NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM57795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemin is a wound-signaling peptide that mediates defenses of tomato plants against herbivorous insects. Perception of systemin by the membrane-bound receptor SR160 results in activation of MAPKs, synthesis of jasmonic acid (JA), and expression of defense genes. To test the function of MAPKs in the response to systemin, we used virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in plants that overexpress the systemin precursor prosystemin (35S::prosys plants). These transgenic plants accumulate high levels of defense proteins and exhibit increased resistance to herbivorous insects. Cosilencing of the MAPKs MPK1 and MPK2 reduced MPK1/2 kinase activity, JA biosynthesis, and expression of JA-dependent defense genes. Application of methyl-JA restored the full defense response. These data show that MPK1 and MPK2 are essential components of the systemin signaling pathway and most likely function upstream of JA biosynthesis. MPK1 and MPK2 are 95% identical at the amino acid level. Specific VIGS of only MPK1 or MPK2 resulted in the same reduction of defense gene expression as cosilencing of MPK1 and MPK2, indicating that gene dosage effects may be important for MPK signaling. In addition, VIGS of the closely related MPK3 also reduced systemin-induced defense responses. The function of MPK1/2 and orthologs in pathogen-induced defenses is well established. Here we show that cosilencing of MPK1 and MPK2 compromised prosystemin-mediated resistance to Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera) herbivory, demonstrating that MPK1 and MPK2 are also required for successful defenses against herbivorous insects.

Indexed as

AnimalsCyclopentanesEnzyme ActivationGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene SilencingImmunity, InnateLarvaManducaMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesOxylipinsPeptidesSolanum lycopersicumCyclopentanesjasmonic acidMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesOxylipinsPeptidessystemin

Identifiers

PMID17623784
PMCPMC1924534
OpenAlexW1994953727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.