Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17623114›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2007

A comparison of galactomannan-ELISA and a newly developed galactomannan-LATEX test in the serologic diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies.

X Keutgen, R Hachem, Y Jiang, T Pham-Williams, J Tarrand, I Raad

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

X KeutgenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
R Hachem
Y Jiang
T Pham-Williams
J Tarrand
I Raad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the sensitivity and specificity of galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (GM-ELISA) with that of a newly developed version of the commercially available latex agglutination test (GM-LATEX) in our patient population. Serum samples were collected from 144 healthy adult donors (controls); another 17 consecutive hematologic malignancy (HM) patients with probable or proven invasive aspergillosis (IA) were tested. Clinical, microbiological, and pathological data were obtained. The sensitivity of the GM-LATEX test was 53% per patient and 66% per sample and that of the GM-ELISA test was 41% per patient and 21% per sample. Both tests demonstrated a specificity of 99%. The GM-LATEX test demonstrated a superior sensitivity in terms of detecting galactomannan and thus may be useful in the diagnosis of IA in patients with HM.

Indexed as

AdultAspergillosisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGalactoseHematologic NeoplasmsHumansLatex Fixation TestsMannansSensitivity and SpecificitygalactomannanGalactoseMannans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.