Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17623095›Full record

ArticleInternational seminars in surgical oncology : ISSO2007

Optimization of FDG-PET/CT imaging protocol for evaluation of patients with primary and metastatic liver disease.

Russ A Kuker, Geraldine Mesoloras, Seza A Gulec

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International seminars in surgical oncology : ISSO, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Comparison ofMolecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Research and application ofSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Use of benzodiazepines before (18)F-FDG-PET/CT dual-phase imaging does not decrease the efficacy of the study.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The current role of PET-CT in the characterization of hepatobiliary malignancies.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Detection of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma onEuroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Russ A KukerDepartment of Radiology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA. rkuker2@med.miami.edu
Geraldine Mesoloras
Seza A Gulec
Goshen Health · USJackson Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate determination of the extrahepatic extent and intrahepatic distribution of disease is very important in patients with primary and metastatic liver disease for deciding whether a patient receives potentially curable surgery or palliative treatment. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of delayed phase FDG-PET/CT imaging in lesion detection and to define its clinical impact compared to triple-phase contrast enhanced CT (CECT).

methods30 patients underwent delayed phase FDG-PET/CT imaging (90 min whole body scan followed by a delayed abdominal scan at 120 min). Maximum standard uptake values (SUVs) and SUV ratios between tumor and normal liver parenchyma (T/N) were evaluated. In addition, comparison was made to CECT obtained within 10 days of the FDG-PET/CT to evaluate for lesion concordance within individual liver segments (Couinaud designation).

resultsSites of primary malignancies included: colorectal (19), breast (3), pancreas (2), lung (2), carcinoid (2), cholangiocarcinoma (1), and hepatocellular carcinoma (1). There was a significant increase in SUV value of liver lesions between early and delayed acquisition (P < 0.001). Although there was not a significant reduction in liver background activity between the two studies, there was a strong increase in T/N ratio (P < 0.001) allowing better lesion detection by visual inspection. New lesions were identified in 5 of the 30 patients, which were not appreciated on the early scan. Delayed phase FDG-PET/CT identified one lesion which was not present on the corresponding CECT. Delayed phase FDG-PET/CT revealed extrahepatic sites of metastases not appreciated on CECT in 6 patients.

conclusionDelayed phase FDG-PET/CT protocol improved lesion detectability in primary and metastatic liver disease, revealing new lesions in 17% of the patients. Moreover, FDG-PET/CT identified extrahepatic disease not seen on CECT in 20% of the patients.

Identifiers

PMID17623095
PMCPMC1939707
OpenAlexW1529973267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.