ArticleCritical care (London, England)2007
A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incorporating Dynamic Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness Into Goal-Directed Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Bundled care for septic shock: an analysis of clinical trials.Critical care medicine · 2010Pooled it
- Competition in collaborative clothing: a qualitative case study of influences on collaborative quality improvement in the ICU.BMJ quality & safety · 2013Trial
- Plasma exchange using peripheral arterial and venous access in the pediatric intensive care unit.Transfusion · 2025Article
- Fluid management of emergency department patients with sepsis-A survey of fluid resuscitation practices.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Equipoise in Appropriate Initial Volume Resuscitation for Patients in Septic Shock With Heart Failure: Results of a Multicenter Clinician Survey.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2020Article
- Retrospective analysis of central venous catheters in elective intracranial surgery - Is there any benefit?PloS one · 2019Article
- Utility of central venous pressure measurement in renal transplantation: Is it evidence based?World journal of transplantation · 2018Review
- Impact of intravascular thrombosis on failure of radial arterial catheters in critically ill patients: a nested case-control study.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
- Resuscitation fluid composition affects hepatic inflammation in a murine model of early sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2017Article
- Balanced versus isotonic saline resuscitation-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in operation rooms and intensive care units.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Physician Variation in Time to Antimicrobial Treatment for Septic Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.Critical care medicine · 2017Article
- Article
- A Comparison of Residents' Knowledge Regarding the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guideline.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2017Article
- Article
- Vasopressors in shock: are we meeting our target and do we really understand what we are aiming at?Intensive care medicine · 2016Article
- The Dose Response Multicentre Investigation on Fluid Assessment (DoReMIFA) in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Article
- Fluid resuscitation practice patterns in intensive care units of the USA: a cross-sectional survey of critical care physicians.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2016Article
- Postoperative fluid management.World journal of critical care medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecent evidence suggests that early, aggressive resuscitation in patients with septic shock reduces mortality. The objective of this survey was to characterize reported resuscitation practices of Canadian physicians caring for adult critically ill patients with early septic shock.
methodsA scenario-based self-administered national survey was sent out to Canadian critical care physicians. One hypothetical scenario was developed to obtain information on several aspects of resuscitation in early septic shock, including monitoring and resuscitation end-points, fluid administration, red blood cell transfusion triggers, and use of inotropes. The sampling frame was physician members of Canadian national and provincial critical care societies.
resultsThe survey response rate was 232 out of 355 (65.3%). Medicine was the most common primary specialty (60.0%), most respondents had practiced for 6 to 10 years (30.0%), and 82.0% were male. The following monitoring devices/parameters were reported as used/measured 'often' or 'always' by at least 89% of respondents: oxygen saturation (100%), Foley catheters (100%), arterial blood pressure lines (96.6%), telemetry (94.3%), and central venous pressure (89.2%). Continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation was employed 'often' or 'always' by 9.8% of respondents. The two most commonly cited resuscitation end-points were urine output (96.5%) and blood pressure (91.8%). Over half of respondents used normal saline (84.5%), Ringers lactate (52.2%), and pentastarch (51.3%) 'often' or 'always' for early fluid resuscitation. In contrast, 5% and 25% albumin solutions were cited as used 'often' or 'always' by 3.9% and 1.3% of respondents, respectively. Compared with internists, surgeons and anesthesiologists (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 9.8 (2.9 to 32.7) and 3.8 (1.7 to 8.7), respectively) reported greater use of Ringers lactate. In the setting of a low central venous oxygen saturation, 52.5% of respondents reported use of inotropic support 'often' or 'always'. Only 7.6% of physicians stated they would use a red blood cell transfusion trigger of 100 g/l to optimize oxygen delivery further.
conclusionOur survey results suggest that there is substantial practice variation in the resuscitation of adult patients with early septic shock. More randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.