Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17620612›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Electrochemical attosyringe.

François O Laforge, James Carpino, Susan A Rotenberg, Michael V Mirkin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Single molecule delivery into living cells.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent advances in single-cell subcellular sampling.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A subcellular cookie cutter for spatial genomics in human tissue.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Article
  12. Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy.Chemical reviews · 2021
    Review
  13. Microfluidic and Nanofluidic Intracellular Delivery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mitochondrial isolation: when size matters.Wellcome open research · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. On the intersection of electrochemistry and mass spectrometry.Current opinion in electrochemistry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

François O LaforgeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Queens College-City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367, USA.
James Carpino
Susan A Rotenberg
Michael V Mirkin
Queens College, CUNY · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to manipulate ultrasmall volumes of liquids is essential in such diverse fields as cell biology, microfluidics, capillary chromatography, and nanolithography. In cell biology, it is often necessary to inject material of high molecular weight (e.g., DNA, proteins) into living cells because their membranes are impermeable to such molecules. All techniques currently used for microinjection are plagued by two common problems: the relatively large injector size and volume of injected fluid, and poor control of the amount of injected material. Here we demonstrate the possibility of electrochemical control of the fluid motion that allows one to sample and dispense attoliter-to-picoliter (10(-18) to 10(-12) liter) volumes of either aqueous or nonaqueous solutions. By changing the voltage applied across the liquid/liquid interface, one can produce a sufficient force to draw solution inside a nanopipette and then inject it into an immobilized biological cell. A high success rate was achieved in injections of fluorescent dyes into cultured human breast cells. The injection of femtoliter-range volumes can be monitored by video microscopy, and current/resistance-based approaches can be used to control injections from very small pipettes. Other potential applications of the electrochemical syringe include fluid dispensing in nanolithography and pumping in microfluidic systems.

Indexed as

SyringesCells, CulturedCells, ImmobilizedElectrochemistryFluorescent DyesHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceTime FactorsWaterFluorescent DyesWater

Identifiers

PMID17620612
PMCPMC1924598
OpenAlexW2572509048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.