ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2007
Analysis of T-cell clonality using laser capture microdissection and high-resolution microcapillary electrophoresis.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A New and Simple TRG Multiplex PCR Assay for Assessment of T-cell Clonality: A Comparative Study from the EuroClonality Consortium.HemaSphere · 2019Article
- 12-Chemokine gene signature identifies lymph node-like structures in melanoma: potential for patient selection for immunotherapy?Scientific reports · 2012Article
- The role of molecular pathology in the diagnosis of cutaneous lymphomas.Pathology research international · 2012Article
- Assay design affects the interpretation of T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangements: comparison of the performance of a one-tube assay with the BIOMED-2-based TCRG gene clonality assay.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2010Article
- Scientific considerations for evaluating cancer bioassays conducted by the Ramazzini Institute.Environmental health perspectivesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of clonal lymphocytic populations by polymerase chain reaction may be difficult in cases with scant cellular infiltrates or those with a heterogeneous population of cells. Here, we assessed the diagnostic utility of laser capture microdissection (LCM) and high-resolution microcapillary electrophoresis in the analysis of clonality of small biopsy specimens. Clonality was determined in 24 cases: five reactive tonsils, five reactive lymph nodes, six inflammatory skin lesions, and eight T-cell lymphomas. CD3-positive T lymphocytes were captured by LCM from paraffinized immunohistochemically stained sections. Genomic DNA was analyzed for T-cell receptor-gamma gene rearrangement by polymerase chain reaction followed by high-resolution microcapillary electrophoresis with the DNA 500 LabChip and the Agilent Bioanalyzer. In the reactive specimens, T-cell receptor-gamma polymerase chain reaction revealed monoclonal bands when 10 to 1000 cells were captured. This pattern changed to polyclonal when higher numbers of cells were microdissected (2000 to 10,000 cells). In contrast, lymphoma cells were consistently monoclonal whether low or high numbers were microdissected. Microcapillary electrophoresis coupled with LCM facilitated clonality analysis in equivocal cases. In two of eight lymphoma cases, LCM revealed diagnostic monoclonal bands, whereas routine T-cell receptor-gamma assessment of whole tissue sections with 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis demonstrated only minor clonal bands. We conclude that clonality determined by LCM is cell number-dependent. Biopsy specimens containing low numbers of reactive polyclonal T cells may produce pseudomonoclonal bands and therefore should be interpreted with great caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.