Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17620376›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

Occurrence of tetracycline resistance genes among Escherichia coli isolates from the phase 3 clinical trials for tigecycline.

Margareta Tuckman, Peter J Petersen, Anita Y M Howe, Mark Orlowski, Stanley Mullen, Karen Chan, Patricia A Bradford, C Hal Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Molecular characterization of theFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antibiotics Resistance inInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Correlation of minimum inhibitory concentrations between human and animal antimicrobials againstJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Emergence of a NovelAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  12. Characterization of the IncHIThe Journal of antibiotics · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapid Detection of High-Level Tigecycline Resistance in Tet(X)-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margareta TuckmanInfectious Diseases Discovery Research, Wyeth Research, Pearl River, New York 10965, USA.
Peter J Petersen
Anita Y M Howe
Mark Orlowski
Stanley Mullen
Karen Chan
Patricia A Bradford
C Hal Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tigecycline, a member of the glycylcycline class of antibiotics, was designed to maintain the antibacterial spectrum of the tetracyclines while overcoming the classic mechanisms of tetracycline resistance. The current study was designed to monitor the prevalence of the tet(A), tet(B), tet(C), tet(D), tet(E), and tet(M) resistance determinants in Escherichia coli isolates collected during the worldwide tigecycline phase 3 clinical trials. A subset of strains were also screened for the tet(G), tet(K), tet(L), and tet(Y) genes. Of the 1,680 E. coli clinical isolates screened for resistance to classical tetracyclines, 405 (24%) were minocycline resistant (MIC > or = 8 microg/ml) and 248 (15%) were tetracycline resistant (MIC > or = 8 microg/ml) but susceptible to minocycline (MIC < or = 4 microg/ml). A total of 452 tetracycline-resistant, nonduplicate isolates were positive by PCR for at least one of the six tetracycline resistance determinants examined. Over half of the isolates encoding a single determinant were positive for tet(A) (26%) or tet(B) (32%) with tet(C), tet(D), tet(E), and tet(M), collectively, found in 4% of isolates. Approximately 33% of the isolates were positive for more than one resistance determinant, with the tet(B) plus tet(E) combination the most highly represented, found in 11% of isolates. The susceptibilities of the tetracycline-resistant strains to tigecycline (MIC(90), 0.5 microg/ml), regardless of the encoded tet determinant(s), were comparable to the tigecycline susceptibility of tetracycline-susceptible strains (MIC(90), 0.5 microg/ml). The results provide a current (2002 to 2006) picture of the distribution of common tetracycline resistance determinants encoded in a globally sourced collection of clinical E. coli strains.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMinocyclineReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTetracycline ResistanceTigecyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsMinocyclineTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID17620376
PMCPMC2043223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.