Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17620003›Full record

ArticleInflammation2007

Brown coal derived humate inhibits contact hypersensitivity; an efficacy, toxicity and teratogenicity study in rats.

C E J Van Rensburg, J R Snyman, T Mokoele, A D Cromarty

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Comprehensive Toxicological Assessment of Fulvic Acid.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C E J Van RensburgDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, PO Box 2034, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa. cmedlen@postillion.up.ac.za
J R Snyman
T Mokoele
A D Cromarty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe effects of two humate products were compared to that of prednisolone on a contact hypersensitivity rat model.

methodsRats, sensitized with dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), were placed on a daily oral treatment of 61 mg/kg BW of humate derived from either leonardite or bituminous coal or on prednisolone at one mg/kg BW and challenged 6 days later with a topical application of DNFB to the right ear. The inflamed ears were measured daily. In a toxicity study rats were exposed to daily oral treatment of leonardite humate at 1,000 mg/kg BW for 1 month. A teratogenicity study was done where pregnant rats were treated with 500 mg/kg BW on days 5 to 17 of pregnancy.

resultsOnly the leonardite humate compared favourably with prednisolone in suppressing contact hypersensitivity. No signs of toxicity were observed and weight gain was normal during the 6-day and 1 month treatments and during the teratogenicity study with the leonardite humate. However, the rats on the other two products experienced slower weight gain.

conclusionThe identification of a naturally occurring nontoxic compound with anti-inflammatory activity is exciting and merits further evaluation in the treatment of patients suffering from inflammatory conditions.

Indexed as

CoalHumic SubstancesAbnormalities, Drug-InducedAdministration, OralAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBody WeightDermatitis, ContactDinitrofluorobenzeneDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFetusPrednisolonePregnancyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCoalDinitrofluorobenzeneHumic SubstancesPrednisolone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.