ArticleMicrobial ecology2008
Comparison of rhizosphere bacterial communities in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants for systemic acquired resistance.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhizosphere microbial community construction during the latitudinal spread of the invader Chromolaena odorata.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Understanding the dynamic interactions of root-knot nematodes and their host: role of plant growth promoting bacteria and abiotic factors.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Rhizosphere microbial community enrichment processes in healthy and diseased plants: implications of soil properties on biomarkers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Drought-resistant trait of different crop genotypes determines assembly patterns of soil and phyllosphere microbial communities.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Soil bacterial community composition is more stable in kiwifruit orchards relative to phyllosphere communities over time.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Article
- The Arabidopsis holobiont: a (re)source of insights to understand the amazing world of plant-microbe interactions.Environmental microbiome · 2023Review
- Plant Microbiome: An Ocean of Possibilities for Improving Disease Resistance in Plants.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Variation and stability of rhizosphere bacterial communities ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Rhizosphere Signaling: Insights into Plant-Rhizomicrobiome Interactions for Sustainable Agronomy.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Transfer of Nitrogen and Phosphorus From Cattle Manure to Soil and Oats Under Simulative Cattle Manure Deposition.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Hormones as go-betweens in plant microbiome assembly.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2021Review
- Plant-microbiome interactions for sustainable agriculture: a review.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021Review
- Diversity and structural differences of bacterial microbial communities in rhizocompartments of desert leguminous plants.PloS one · 2020Article
- The Ecology of Salicylic Acid Signaling: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Effects with Applications in Agriculture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Article
- The plant microbiome.Genome biology · 2013Review
- Induced systemic resistance and the rhizosphere microbiome.The plant pathology journal · 2013Article
- Activation of the jasmonic acid plant defence pathway alters the composition of rhizosphere bacterial communities.PloS one · 2013Article
- Plant age and genotype impact the progression of bacterial community succession in the Arabidopsis rhizosphere.Plant signaling & behavior · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is an inducible systemic plant defense against a broad spectrum of plant pathogens, with the potential to secrete antimicrobial compounds into the soil. However, its impact on rhizosphere bacteria is not known. In this study, we examined fingerprints of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana to determine the effect of SAR on bacterial community structure and diversity. We compared Arabidopsis mutants that are constitutive and non-inducible for SAR and verified SAR activation by measuring pathogenesis-related protein activity via a beta-glucoronidase (GUS) reporter construct driven by the beta-1-3 glucanase promoter. We used terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis of MspI- and HaeIII-digested 16S rDNA to estimate bacterial rhizosphere community diversity, with Lactobacillus sp. added as internal controls. T-RFLP analysis showed a clear rhizosphere effect on community structure, and diversity analysis of both rhizosphere and bulk soil operational taxonomic units (as defined by terminal restriction fragments) using richness, Shannon-Weiner, and Simpson's diversity indices and evenness confirmed that the presence of Arabidopsis roots significantly altered bacterial communities. This effect of altered soil microbial community structure by plants was also seen upon multivariate cluster analysis of the terminal restriction fragments. We also found visible differences in the rhizosphere community fingerprints of different Arabidopsis SAR mutants; however, there was no clear decrease of rhizosphere diversity because of constitutive SAR expression. Our study suggests that SAR can alter rhizosphere bacterial communities, opening the door to further understanding and application of inducible plant defense as a driving force in structuring soil bacterial assemblages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17619212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.