Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17619110›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal

Astroglial injury in an ex vivo model: contributions to its analysis in enriched cell cultures.

Ximena A Lanosa, Jorge A Colombo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ximena A LanosaUnidad de Neurobiología Aplicada (UNA), CEMIC, Av. Galván 4102 (C1431FWO), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jorge A Colombo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro cell culture models have been proposed to analyze some of the complex structural and functional characteristics involved in astroglial changes after neural injury in vivo. This report contributes to analyze the proposed hypothesis that an experimentally induced discontinuity of a confluent cellular culture could represent a useful model for the analysis of the processes involved in a neural lesion. For this purpose, it was decided to characterize astroglial proliferation and dye coupling state after a "scratch wound" applied to confluent, astrocyte-enriched cell cultures, obtained from several rat brain regions. Proliferation was assessed in terms of bromodeoxyuridine nuclear incorporation as a function of lesion width, serum deprivation, time after confluence, brain region origin, postlesional culture medium changes and agitation, and after application of a gap-junction uncoupling agent. The proliferative reaction after injury was neither cell type-specific nor brain region specific, nor was significantly affected by neither of the above-mentioned variables. Furthermore, injury failed to significantly affect the astroglial dye coupling state. Results suggest that the proliferative response observed under present conditions would depend on the disruption of contact inhibition rather than on astroglial mitogenic signals released from the wound and operating by either extracellular or cell coupling mechanisms. Present results question the validity of astrocyte-enriched cell cultures as an experimental model of neural tissue injury in vivo, as they do not appear to reproduce fundamental characteristics expressed in situ.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAstrocytesBrainBromodeoxyuridineCell CountCell Culture TechniquesCell NucleusCell ProliferationColoring AgentsDiffusionGap JunctionsOrgan SpecificityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySerumBromodeoxyuridineColoring Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.