Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17618552›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2007

Diagnostic approaches for patients with suspected encephalitis.

Karen C Bloch, Carol Glaser

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Encephalitis-associated hospitalizations among American Indians and Alaska Natives.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Article
  10. Assembly of viral genomes from metagenomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014
    Article
  11. Case definitions, diagnostic algorithms, and priorities in encephalitis: consensus statement of the international encephalitis consortium.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Viral pathogen discovery.Current opinion in microbiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen C BlochVanderbilt University Medical Center, A-2200 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 27232-2582, USA. karen.bloch@vanderbilt.edu
Carol Glaser
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encephalitis represents a diagnostic challenge, with an infectious etiology identified in only 40% to 70% of cases. More than 100 agents have been either definitively or anecdotally associated with encephalitis. Important considerations for diagnosis include selection of the appropriate clinical specimen (serum vs cerebrospinal fluid), determining the most sensitive diagnostic assay (serology vs polymerase chain reaction), and assessing causality when an organism is identified outside of the central nervous system (eg, a positive nasal swab for influenza). This review aims to provide an evidence-based, clinically relevant approach to the diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with encephalitis, focusing on the most common or important causes in the immunocompetent host. Diagnostic issues associated with encephalitis due to herpes-group viruses, arboviruses (including West Nile virus), rickettsiae, bartonella, enteroviruses, and rabies are discussed in-depth. Diagnostic testing should be individualized based on clinical presentation and epidemiology.

Identifiers

PMID17618552
OpenAlexW2081157962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.