ArticleJournal of bacteriology2007
The deleterious effect of an insertion sequence removing the last twenty percent of the essential Escherichia coli rpsA gene is due to mRNA destabilization, not protein truncation.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of an operon and its regulator required for autoaggregation inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Transposition of ISApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 unfolds structured mRNAs onto the ribosome for active translation initiation.PLoS biology · 2013Article
- Distinct co-evolution patterns of genes associated to DNA polymerase III DnaE and PolC.BMC genomics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ribosomal protein S1, the product of the essential rpsA gene, consists of six imperfect repeats of the same motif. Besides playing a critical role in translation initiation on most mRNAs, S1 also specifically autoregulates the translation of its own messenger. ssyF29 is a viable rpsA allele that carries an IS10R insertion within the coding sequence, resulting in a protein lacking the last motif (S1DeltaC). The growth of ssyF29 cells is slower than that of wild-type cells. Moreover, translation of a reporter rpsA-lacZ fusion is specifically stimulated, suggesting that the last motif is necessary for autoregulation. However, in ssyF29 cells the rpsA mRNA is also strongly destabilized; this destabilization, by causing S1DeltaC shortage, might also explain the observed slow-growth and autoregulation defect. To fix this ambiguity, we have introduced an early stop codon in the rpsA chromosomal gene, resulting in the synthesis of the S1DeltaC protein without an IS10R insertion (rpsADeltaC allele). rpsADeltaC cells grow much faster than their ssyF29 counterparts; moreover, in these cells S1 autoregulation and mRNA stability are normal. In vitro, the S1DeltaC protein binds mRNAs (including its own) almost as avidly as wild-type S1. These results demonstrate that the last S1 motif is dispensable for translation and autoregulation: the defects seen with ssyF29 cells reflect an IS10R-mediated destabilization of the rpsA mRNA, probably due to facilitated exonucleolytic degradation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.