ArticleJournal of bacteriology2007
Integration site selection by the Bacteroides conjugative transposon CTnBST.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ggMOB: Elucidation of genomic conjugative features and associated cargo genes across bacterial genera using genus-genus mobilization networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The Ellis Island Effect: A novel mobile element in a multi-drug resistantMobile genetic elements · 2014Article
- Homology-dependent interactions determine the order of strand exchange by IntDOT recombinase.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- An unexpected effect of tetracycline concentration: growth phase-associated excision of the Bacteroides mobilizable transposon NBU1.Journal of bacteriology · 2009Article
- Secondary chromosomal attachment site and tandem integration of the mobilizable Salmonella genomic island 1.PloS one · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A newly discovered Bacteroides conjugative transposon (CTn), CTnBST, integrates more site specifically than two other well-studied CTns, the Bacteroides CTn CTnDOT and the enterococcal CTn Tn916. Moreover, the integrase of CTnBST, IntBST, had the C-terminal 6-amino-acid signature that is associated with the catalytic regions of members of the tyrosine recombinase family, most of which integrate site specifically. Also, in most of these integrases, all of the conserved amino acids are required for integration. In the case of IntBST, however, we found that changing three of the six conserved amino acids in the signature, one of which was the presumed catalytic tyrosine, resulted in a 1,000-fold decrease in integration frequency. Changes in the other amino acids had little or no effect. Thus, although the CTnBST integrase still seems to be a member of the tyrosine recombinase family, it clearly differs to some extent from other members of the family in its catalytic site. We also determined the sequence requirements for CTnBST integration in the 18-bp region where the crossover occurs preferentially during integration. We found that CTnBST integrates in this preferred site about one-half of the time but can also use other sites. A consensus sequence was tentatively derived by comparison of a few secondary sites: AATCTGNNAAAT. We report here that within the consensus region, no single base change affected the frequency of integration. However, 3 bp at one end of the consensus sequence (CTG) proved to be essential for integration into the preferred site. This sequence appeared to be at one end of a 7-bp crossover region, CTGNNAA. The other bases could vary without affecting either integration frequency or specificity. Thus, in contrast to well-studied site-specific recombinases which require homology throughout the crossover region, integration of CTnBST requires homology at one end of the crossover region but not at the other end.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.