Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2007
Lopinavir/Ritonavir pharmacokinetic profile: impact of sex and other covariates following a change from twice-daily to once-daily therapy.
Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00148759 (A Switch From Twice Daily to Once Daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Switch From Twice Daily to Once Daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir: A 24-hour Pharmacokinetic Profile to Evaluate Sex Differences
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics among HIV-infected women and men.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Trial
- Immune activation mediated change in alpha-1-acid glycoprotein: impact on total and free lopinavir plasma exposure.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and virological efficacy after switch to once-daily lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2011Trial
- Pharmacokinetic interactions between the potential COVID-19 treatment drugs lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in rats.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2021Article
- Effect of Systemic Inflammatory Response to SARS-CoV-2 on Lopinavir and Hydroxychloroquine Plasma Concentrations.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Sleeve Gastrectomy in Morbidly Obese HIV Patients: Focus on Anti-retroviral Treatment Absorption After Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2018Article
- Integrated population pharmacokinetic/viral dynamic modelling of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 treatment-naïve patients.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2014Article
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Darunavir and Etravirine in HIV-1-Infected, Treatment-Experienced Patients in the Gender, Race, and Clinical Experience (GRACE) Trial.AIDS research and treatment · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of sex on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir. Interaction between lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir was also evaluated. Steady-state plasma samples were obtained from virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients on lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200-mg soft gel capsule taken once daily. Drug assays were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated by noncompartmental method were reported as 90% confidence intervals (CIs) about the geometric mean ratio (GMR). There were 9 males and 11 females. No sex differences were observed in lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics profile. The GMR(sex) (women compared with men) for lopinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(24)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and minimum concentration (C(min)) was 0.95 (90% CI, 0.70-1.29), 0.88 (90% CI, 0.67-1.15), and 1.27 (90% CI, 0.60-2.66), respectively. Similarly, the GMR(sex) for ritonavir AUC(24), C(max), and C(min) was 0.84 (90% CI, 0.57-1.24), 0.79 (90% CI, 0.50-1.22), and 1.02 (90% CI, 0.58-1.80), respectively. Tenofovir coadministration led to a reduction in lopinavir/ritonavir plasma exposure, giving a lopinavir GMR(tenofovir) for C(max) of 0.72 (90% CI, 0.57-0.93) and AUC(24) of 0.74 (90% CI, 0.56-0.98), respectively. No difference in lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations between sexes was demonstrated in this study. However, tenofovir coadministration lowered lopinavir/ritonavir plasma exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.