Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17614358›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2007

Specificity and selectivity evaluations of ligand binding assay of protein therapeutics against concomitant drugs and related endogenous proteins.

Jean Lee, Hongjin Ma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean LeePharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA. jwlee@amgen.com
Hongjin Ma
Amgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macromolecule drugs designed against specific target proteins/ receptors have been applied in combination therapies, especially for complex and related diseases such as cancer for synergistic efficacy and alleviation of side effects. Protein therapeutics are typically measured using ligand binding assays (LBA). Evaluating the specificity and selectivity of LBA against their target proteins or in instances where concomitantly administered drugs are given was brought up during a conversation at the 3rd American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists/US Food and Drug Administration Bioanalytical Workshop but was not discussed at the meeting sessions. The purpose of this article is to discuss the challenges related to this issue and present a few approaches and experiences to elicit further discussions. Specificity and selectivity tests should be based on the anticipated levels of the individual therapeutics with reference to the dosing regimens defined in the clinical study protocol. When the concomitantly administered compound is available as a pure or well-defined material, various concentrations from zero to above the expected high levels are added to validation samples of the protein therapeutics to assess specificity. Recovery results from spiked samples of target patient populations on concomitant medications can also be compared with those from normal individuals for selectivity. If the drug has an endogenous counterpart, the baseline concentrations of each lot should be subtracted from the test samples in the selectivity assessment. This article illustrates a flexible approach to evaluating specificity and selectivity on samples from target patient populations receiving multiple medications.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsRecombinant ProteinsDrug InteractionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansIndicators and ReagentsLigandsNeoplasmsProtein BindingSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsIndicators and ReagentsLigandsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17614358
PMCPMC2751405
OpenAlexW2078292938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.