ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2007
Troponin T elevation and prognosis after multivessel compared with single-vessel elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina: a common approach? Lessons learned from the EHS PCI registry.Heart and vessels · 2012Article
- Troponin T elevation and prognosis after multivessel compared with single-vessel elective percutaneous coronary intervention.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND.: Although techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have improved, patients with PCI of more vessels may still have an increased risk. We performed a prospective observational study evaluating the differences between multivessel and single-vessel procedures according to postprocedural troponin T (TnT) elevation and events during follow-up. METHODS.: The study included 713 patients without elevated TnT (<0.05 ng/ml) before PCI. Primary endpoint was the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat coronary angiography and readmission for anginal symptoms during the mean follow-up of 10.9 months. RESULTS.: TnT after PCI was elevated in 150 patients (21%) and was significantly associated with an increased incidence of the primary endpoint (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.38). PCI of more than one vessel was performed in 146 patients (20%). These patients more often had increased TnT levels after the procedure (31.5 vs. 18.3%, p=0.001) and an increased incidence of the primary endpoint during follow-up (28 vs. 19%, p=0.01). After multivariable analysis, multivessel PCI was a statistically significant predictor of postprocedural TnT increase (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.06). Multivessel PCI was also associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.52), but after adjusting for multivessel disease this association was not statistically significant (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.19). CONCLUSION.: Elective PCI of more vessels in one session is, in comparison with single-vessel PCI, more often associated with postprocedural troponin T rise and a (nonsignificantly) higher incidence of cardiac events during follow-up. Whether staged PCI is associated with less morbidity has to be assessed. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:178-83.).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.