ReviewPloS one2007
Immunodominance of lytic cycle antigens in Epstein-Barr virus-specific CD4+ T cell preparations for therapy.
Review in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- CD4Science translational medicine · 2026Article
- A novel multiplex approach for the comprehensive analysis of the Epstein-Barr virus-specific humoral immune response.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing the fitness of Epstein-Barr virus following its reactivation.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Coeliac disease as a model for understanding multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Stem cell memory EBV-specific T cells control EBV tumor growth and persist in vivo.Science advances · 2024Article
- Cotargeting EBV lytic as well as latent cycle antigens increases T-cell potency against lymphoma.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Evaluation of novel Epstein-Barr virus-derived antigen formulations for monitoring virus-specific T cells in pediatric patients with infectious mononucleosis.Virology journal · 2024Article
- Contribution of the Epstein-Barr virus to the oncogenesis of mature T-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Mechanisms of T cell evasion by Epstein-Barr virus and implications for tumor survival.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Association between IgG responses against the nucleocapsid proteins of alphacoronaviruses and COVID-19 severity.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Cytotoxic CD4+ T-cells specific for EBV capsid antigen BORF1 are maintained in long-term latently infected healthy donors.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- 'Off-the-shelf' allogeneic antigen-specific adoptive T-cell therapy for the treatment of multiple EBV-associated malignancies.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Article
- The Epstein-Barr Virus Major Tegument Protein BNRF1 Is a Common Target of Cytotoxic CD4Journal of virology · 2020Article
- Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as a Hyper-Regulated Immune System Driven by an Interplay Between Regulatory T Cells and Chronic Human Herpesvirus Infections.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- The T-cell Response to Epstein-Barr Virus-New Tricks From an Old Dog.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Immunogenic particles with a broad antigenic spectrum stimulate cytolytic T cells and offer increased protection against EBV infection ex vivo and in mice.PLoS pathogens · 2018Article
- Epstein-Barr virus strain heterogeneity impairs human T-cell immunity.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2018Article
- Signaling by the Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 protein induces potent cytotoxic CD4Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Vaccine Development for Epstein-Barr Virus.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with a number of human malignancies. EBV-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients has been successfully treated by the adoptive transfer of polyclonal EBV-specific T cell lines containing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell components. Although patients receiving T cell preparations with a higher CD4+ T cell proportion show better clinical responses, the specificity of the infused CD4+ component has remained completely unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe generated LCL-stimulated T cell lines from 21 donors according to clinical protocols, and analyzed the antigen specificity of the CD4+ component in EBV-specific T cell preparations using a genetically engineered EBV mutant that is unable to enter the lytic cycle, and recombinantly expressed and purified EBV proteins. Surprisingly, CD4+ T cell lines from acutely and persistently EBV-infected donors consistently responded against EBV lytic cycle antigens and autoantigens, but barely against latent cycle antigens of EBV hitherto considered principal immunotherapeutic targets. Lytic cycle antigens were predominantly derived from structural proteins of the virus presented on MHC II via receptor-mediated uptake of released viral particles, but also included abundant infected cell proteins whose presentation involved intercellular protein transfer. Importantly, presentation of virion antigens was severely impaired by acyclovir treatment of stimulator cells, as currently performed in most clinical protocols. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that structural antigens of EBV are the immunodominant targets of CD4+ T cells in LCL-stimulated T cell preparations. These findings add to our understanding of the immune response against this human tumor-virus and have important implications for the improvement of immunotherapeutic strategies against EBV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.