Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17611619›Full record

ReviewPloS one2007

Immunodominance of lytic cycle antigens in Epstein-Barr virus-specific CD4+ T cell preparations for therapy.

Dinesh Adhikary, Uta Behrends, Heike Boerschmann, Andrea Pfünder, Stefan Burdach, Andreas Moosmann, Klaus Witter, Georg W Bornkamm, Josef Mautner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CD4Science translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Signaling by the Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 protein induces potent cytotoxic CD4Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  20. Vaccine Development for Epstein-Barr Virus.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dinesh AdhikaryClinical Cooperation Group, Institute for Clinical and Molecular Biology, GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Munich, Germany; Children's Hospital, Hematology-Oncology, University of Technology, Munich, Germany.
Uta Behrends
Heike Boerschmann
Andrea Pfünder
Stefan Burdach
Andreas Moosmann
Klaus Witter
Georg W Bornkamm
Josef Mautner
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with a number of human malignancies. EBV-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients has been successfully treated by the adoptive transfer of polyclonal EBV-specific T cell lines containing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell components. Although patients receiving T cell preparations with a higher CD4+ T cell proportion show better clinical responses, the specificity of the infused CD4+ component has remained completely unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe generated LCL-stimulated T cell lines from 21 donors according to clinical protocols, and analyzed the antigen specificity of the CD4+ component in EBV-specific T cell preparations using a genetically engineered EBV mutant that is unable to enter the lytic cycle, and recombinantly expressed and purified EBV proteins. Surprisingly, CD4+ T cell lines from acutely and persistently EBV-infected donors consistently responded against EBV lytic cycle antigens and autoantigens, but barely against latent cycle antigens of EBV hitherto considered principal immunotherapeutic targets. Lytic cycle antigens were predominantly derived from structural proteins of the virus presented on MHC II via receptor-mediated uptake of released viral particles, but also included abundant infected cell proteins whose presentation involved intercellular protein transfer. Importantly, presentation of virion antigens was severely impaired by acyclovir treatment of stimulator cells, as currently performed in most clinical protocols. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that structural antigens of EBV are the immunodominant targets of CD4+ T cells in LCL-stimulated T cell preparations. These findings add to our understanding of the immune response against this human tumor-virus and have important implications for the improvement of immunotherapeutic strategies against EBV.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAutoantigensCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsFlow CytometryGenes, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansImmunodominant EpitopesImmunophenotypingLymphocytesLymphoproliferative DisordersTransplantation ImmunologyViral ProteinsAutoantigensImmunodominant EpitopesViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17611619
PMCPMC1894652
OpenAlexW2115706422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.