Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17611606›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2007

Replication blocking lesions present a unique substrate for homologous recombination.

Jordan D Ward, Louise J Barber, Mark Ir Petalcorin, Judith Yanowitz, Simon J Boulton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NuRD chromatin remodeling is required to repair exogenous DSBs in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ZSWIM7 Is Associated With Human Female Meiosis and Familial Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
  6. Mechanism of mitotic recombination: insights from C. elegans.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stalled replication forks generate a distinct mutational signature in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jordan D WardDNA Damage Response Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, The London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Herts, UK.
Louise J Barber
Mark Ir Petalcorin
Judith Yanowitz
Simon J Boulton
Cancer Research UK · GBDepartment of Embryology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) plays a critical role in the restart of blocked replication forks, but how this is achieved remains poorly understood. We show that mutants in the single Rad51 paralog in Caenorhabditis elegans, rfs-1, permit discrimination between HR substrates generated at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), or following replication fork collapse from HR substrates assembled at replication fork barriers (RFBs). Unexpectedly, RFS-1 is dispensable for RAD-51 recruitment to meiotic and ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs and following replication fork collapse, yet, is essential for RAD-51 recruitment to RFBs formed by DNA crosslinking agents and other replication blocking lesions. Deletion of rfs-1 also suppresses the accumulation of toxic HR intermediates in him-6; top-3 mutants and accelerates deletion formation at presumed endogenous RFBs formed by poly G/C tracts in the absence of DOG-1. These data suggest that RFS-1 is not a general mediator of HR-dependent DSB repair, but acts specifically to promote HR at RFBs. HR substrates generated at conventional DSBs or following replication fork collapse are therefore intrinsically different from those produced during normal repair of blocked replication forks.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA ReplicationRecombination, GeneticAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCrossing Over, GeneticDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairGene DeletionMeiosisMitosisPoly CPoly GProtein BindingRad51 RecombinaseCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsPoly CPoly Gpoly G-poly CRad51 Recombinase

Identifiers

PMID17611606
PMCPMC1933397
OpenAlexW2142229621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.