ArticleJournal of human hypertension2007
Treatment patterns of hypertension and dyslipidaemia in hypertensive patients at higher and lower risk of cardiovascular disease in primary care in the United Kingdom.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterising complex health needs and the use of preventive therapies in the older population: a population-based cohort analysis of UK primary care and hospital linked data.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Article
- Are doctors assessing patients with hypertension appropriately at their initial presentation?Singapore medical journal · 2015Article
- Do we need more than just powerful blood pressure reductions? New paradigms in end-organ protection.Vascular health and risk management · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have investigated the presence of dyslipidaemia in hypertensive individuals. In addition, few data exist on the concurrent treatment of both conditions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This retrospective cohort study examined treatment patterns for hypertension and dyslipidaemia among hypertensive patients in UK primary care. We defined a population of patients aged > or =40 years from the UK General Practice Research Database. Hypertensive individuals with > or =3 additional cardiovascular risk factors (ARFs) were compared with a cohort comprising hypertensive patients with < or =2 ARFs. We analysed the prevalence of risk factors and the prevalence and incidence of treatment for hypertension, dyslipidaemia and for both conditions between January 1997 and December 2001. A total of 117 840 hypertensive patients were identified (23 655 with > or =3 ARFs, 94 185 with < or =2 ARFs) in 1997; in 2001, the number diagnosed as hypertensive was 133 683 (40 248 > or =3 ARFs, 93 435 < or =2 ARFs). The prevalence of antihypertensive treatment in the hypertensive patients with > or =3 ARFs increased during the study. In 2001, approximately one-third of hypertensive patients with > or =3 ARFs were not receiving antihypertensives. Among those patients who received such treatment, the majority received > or =2 separate agents in accordance with current guidelines. Treatment for concurrent hypertension and dyslipidaemia was initiated in <8% of patients with hypertension and > or =3 ARFs in each year. These findings demonstrate the under-recognition/undertreatment of cardiovascular risk factors in UK primary care among patients at risk of CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17611550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.