ArticleHealth services research2007
Overestimating outcome rates: statistical estimation when reliability is suboptimal.
Article in Health services research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Using Electronic Health Records to Identify the Daily Primary Provider During Hospitalization.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Variation in Eligible Patients' Agreeing to and Receiving Lung Cancer Screening: A Cohort Study.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Limitations of Deep Learning Attention Mechanisms in Clinical Research: Empirical Case Study Based on the Korean Diabetic Disease Setting.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Hospital-level variation in the development of persistent critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2020Article
- Variation in Physician-Specific Episode Payments for Major Cancer Surgery and Implications for the Merit-Based Incentive Program.The Journal of surgical research · 2019Article
- Prevalence, Underlying Causes, and Preventability of Sepsis-Associated Mortality in US Acute Care Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- Article
- Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments.Health services research · 2018Observational
- Associations between thin slice ratings of affect and rapport and perceived patient-centeredness in primary care: Comparison of audio and video recordings.Patient education and counseling · 2017Article
- Reviewing deaths in British and US hospitals: a study of two scales for assessing preventability.BMJ quality & safety · 2017Article
- New-onset depression following stable, slow, and rapid rate of prescription opioid dose escalation.Pain · 2017Article
- The prevalence of potentially preventable deaths in an acute care hospital: A retrospective cohort.Medicine · 2017Observational
- Hospital Contributions to Variability in the Use of ICUs Among Elderly Medicare Recipients.Critical care medicine · 2017Article
- Variation in Patient-reported Outcomes Across Hospitals Following Surgery.Medical care · 2015Article
- Dose escalation during the first year of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2015Article
- Multiple cluster analysis for the identification of high-risk census tracts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Denver, Colorado.Resuscitation · 2014Article
- The HANDDS program: a systematic approach for addressing disparities in the provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2014Article
- Improving the reliability of physician "report cards".Medical care · 2013Article
- Case-mix adjusted hospital mortality is a poor proxy for preventable mortality: a modelling study.BMJ quality & safety · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo demonstrate how failure to account for measurement error in an outcome (dependent) variable can lead to significant estimation errors and to illustrate ways to recognize and avoid these errors. DATA SOURCES: Medical literature and simulation models. STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: Systematic review of the published and unpublished epidemiological literature on the rate of preventable hospital deaths and statistical simulation of potential estimation errors based on data from these studies. PRINCIPAL
findingsMost estimates of the rate of preventable deaths in U.S. hospitals rely upon classifying cases using one to three physician reviewers (implicit review). Because this method has low to moderate reliability, estimates based on statistical methods that do not account for error in the measurement of a "preventable death" can result in significant overestimation. For example, relying on a majority rule rating with three reviewers per case (reliability approximately 0.45 for the average of three reviewers) can result in a 50-100 percent overestimation compared with an estimate based upon a reliably measured outcome (e.g., by using 50 reviewers per case). However, there are statistical methods that account for measurement error that can produce much more accurate estimates of outcome rates without requiring a large number of measurements per case.
conclusionThe statistical principles discussed in this case study are critically important whenever one seeks to estimate the proportion of cases belonging to specific categories (such as estimating how many patients have inadequate blood pressure control or identifying high-cost or low-quality physicians). When the true outcome rate is low (<20 percent), using an outcome measure that has low-to-moderate reliability will generally result in substantially overestimating the proportion of the population having the outcome unless statistical methods that adjust for measurement error are used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.