Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17610435›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2007

Utilizing new prescription drugs: disparities among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanic whites.

Junling Wang, Ilene H Zuckerman, Nancy A Miller, Fadia T Shaya, Jason M Noel, C Daniel Mullins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Expensive Medications: A Focus on Sugammadex in the Pediatric Perioperative Setting.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. REPRESENTATION AND EXTRAPOLATION: EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL TRIALSThe quarterly journal of economics · 2024
    Article
  8. Effects of star ratings bonus payments on disparities in medication utilization issues.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Racial and ethnic disparities in the enrolment of medicare medication therapy management programs.Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junling WangDivision of Health Science Administration, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, 847 Monroe Ave., Room 205R, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Ilene H Zuckerman
Nancy A Miller
Fadia T Shaya
Jason M Noel
C Daniel Mullins

Funding

University of Maryland Center for Health Disparities Re*P60MD000532 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BAQUET, CLAUDIA R0SE · 2003 to 2008
$5.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS 5P60MD000532-03NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine racial and ethnic disparities in new prescription drug use. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingSecondary data analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (1996-2001), a national survey representative of U.S. noninstitutionalized civilian population. Drug approval dates were from the GenRx database of Mosby. STUDY

designA negative binomial model was used to compare annual number of times when new drugs were obtained across racial and ethnic groups. Covariates in the model were demographic, economic characteristics, and health status. Drugs were considered new if approved within the past 5 years. We compared non-Hispanic whites with non-Hispanic blacks, and non-Hispanic whites with Hispanic whites, respectively, to examine racial and ethnic disparities separately. PRINCIPAL

findingsDescriptive analyses found smaller racial disparities than ethnic disparities: the average annual number of times when new drugs were obtained was higher among non-Hispanic whites than non-Hispanic blacks (1.71 versus 1.36; p<.01) and Hispanic whites (1.71 versus 1.11; p<.01). Multivariate analyses found smaller ethnic than racial disparities: the number was 22-33 percent lower among non-Hispanic blacks than non-Hispanic whites (significant), and 5-16 percent lower among Hispanic whites than non-Hispanic whites (not always significant), respectively. While the absolute racial disparities decreased over the early years of the life cycles of the products, the reduction in disparities over time was not significant.

conclusionsThere are racial disparities in the use of new medications, which persist during the first 5 years of marketing. Socioeconomic and health characteristics account for a larger share of ethnic disparities than racial disparities.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanDrug TherapyHispanic or LatinoWhite PeopleAdolescentAdultAgedDemographyDrug ApprovalDrug UtilizationFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID17610435
PMCPMC1955281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.