Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17609936›Full record

Trial reportUrological research2007

The use of tamsulozin as adjunctive treatment after ESWL in patients with distal ureteral stone: do we really need it? Results from a randomised study.

S Gravas, V Tzortzis, A Karatzas, A Oeconomou, M D Melekos

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urological research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Does tamsulosin facilitate expulsion of distal ureteric calculus following lithotripsy?Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2008
    Article
  17. CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S GravasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece. sgravas2002@yahoo.com
V Tzortzis
A Karatzas
A Oeconomou
M D Melekos
University Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study aimed to define the position of tamsulosin as adjunctive therapy in patients with stones of the distal ureter who had undergone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). In total, 61 consecutive patients (38 men and 23 women) with single distal radiopaque ureteral stone of > or =6 mm of diameter were enrolled. After ESWL patients were randomized in two groups. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (supp. diclofenac 50 mg) was given to both groups upon demand. In group B, all patients (30) received additionally tamsulozin 0.4 mg every day. Follow-up visits were performed 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after ESWL. Evaluation included a KUB plain film and an ultrasound examination. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of success rate, stone-free rate, expulsion time of the fragments and use of diclofenac. Two patients from the tamsulosin group experienced dizziness and one was withdrawn. The success rate was 58.06 and 66.66% for the control and the tamsulosin group, respectively, while the corresponding values for stone-free rate were 51.6 and 63.33%, respectively. The mean expulsion time of the fragments was 13.22 days for group A and 12.95 days for group B. These results did not achieve statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean diclofenac dose was 118.9 mg in group A and 56.9 mg in group B. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Despite the relatively small number of patients, our data indicate that the use of tamsulosin after ESWL in this specific subgroup of patients does not result in improved success and stone-free rate and expulsion time. In contrast, a significantly reduced need for analgesics was found.

Indexed as

LithotripsyAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSulfonamidesTamsulosinUreteral CalculiAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsSulfonamidesTamsulosin

Identifiers

PMID17609936
OpenAlexW1576470431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.