ArticleGenome research2007
Detecting genetic variation in microarray expression data.
Article in Genome research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mouse strain specific gene expression differences for illumina microarray expression profiling in embryos.BMC research notes · 2012Article
- SNEP: Simultaneous detection of nucleotide and expression polymorphisms using Affymetrix GeneChip.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The use of high-density oligonucleotide arrays to measure the expression levels of thousands of genes in parallel has become commonplace. To take further advantage of the growing body of data, we developed a method, termed "GeSNP," to mine the detailed hybridization patterns in oligonucleotide array expression data for evidence of genetic variation. To demonstrate the performance of the algorithm, the hybridization patterns in data obtained previously from SAMP8/Ta, SAMP10/Ta, and SAMR1/Ta inbred mice and from humans and chimpanzees were analyzed. Genes with consistent strain-specific and species-specific hybridization pattern differences were identified, and approximately 90% of the candidate genes were independently confirmed to harbor sequence differences. Importantly, the quality of gene expression data was also improved by masking the probes of regions with putative sequence differences between species and strains. To illustrate the application to human disease groups, data from an inflammatory bowel disease study were analyzed. GeSNP identified sequence differences in candidate genes previously discovered in independent association and linkage studies and uncovered many promising new candidates. This approach enables the opportunistic extraction of genetic variation information from new or pre-existing gene expression data obtained with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.