Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17607114›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2007

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

Ramón Rami-Porta, David Ball, John Crowley, Dorothy J Giroux, James Jett, William D Travis, Masahiro Tsuboi, Eric Vallières, Peter Goldstraw, International Staging Committee and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Lung Cancer Screening, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Lung cancer screening.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2012
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ramón Rami-PortaThoracic Surgery Service, Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain. rramip@terra.es
David Ball
John Crowley
Dorothy J Giroux
James Jett
William D Travis
Masahiro Tsuboi
Eric Vallières
Peter Goldstraw
International Staging Committee
Cancer Research and Biostatistics
Observers to the Committee
Participating Institutions

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo propose changes in the seventh revision of the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification for lung cancer.

methodsData on 100,869 patients were submitted to the international database, and data for 18,198 of these patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the T component analysis. Survival was calculated for clinical and pathologic T1, T2, T3, T4NOMO completely resected (R0), and for each T descriptor. A running log-rank test was used to assess cutpoints by tumor size. Results were internally and externally validated.

resultsOn the basis of the optimal cutpoints, pT1NOR0 was divided into pT1a < or =2 cm (n = 1816) and pT1b >2 to 3 cm (n = 1653) with 5-year survival rates of 77 and 71% (p < 0.0001). The pT2NOR0 cutpoints resulted in pT2a >3 to 5 cm (n = 2822), pT2b >5 to 7 cm (n = 825), and pT2c >7 cm (n = 364). Their 5-year survival rates were 58, 49, and 35% (p < 0.0001). For clinically staged N0, 5-year survival was 53% for cT1a, 47% for cT1b, 43% for cT2a, 36% for cT2b, and 26% for cT2c. pT3NO (n = 711) and pT4 (any N) (n = 340) had 5-year survival rates of 38 and 22%. pT4 (additional nodule(s) in the same lobe) (n = 363) had a 5-year survival rate of 28%, similar to pT3 (p = 0.28) and better than other pT4 (p = 0.0029). For pM1 (ipsilateral pulmonary nodules) (n = 180), 5-year survival was 22%, similar to pT4. For cT4-malignant pleural effusion/nodules, 5-year survival was 2%.

conclusionRecommended changes in the T classification are to subclassify T1 into T1a and T1b, and T2 into T2a and T2b; and to reclassify T2c and additional nodule(s) in the same lobe as T3, nodule(s) in the ipsilateral nonprimary lobe as T4, and malignant pleural or pericardial effusions as M1.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchSocieties, MedicalCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease ProgressionFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInternational CooperationLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.