ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2007
A qualitative study of Canadian Aboriginal women's beliefs about "credible" cancer information on the internet.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How Older Indigenous Women Living in High-Income Countries Use Digital Health Technology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Literature Review of Cancer Communication with Indigenous Populations in Canada and the United States.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Pooled it
- Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Beliefs Underlying Messages of Anti-Cancer-Screening Websites in Japan: A Qualitative AnalysisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Article
- An evaluation of healthcare information on the Internet: the case of colorectal cancer prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014Article
- African American men's and women's perceptions of clinical trials research: focusing on prostate cancer among a high-risk population in the South.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2013Article
- African American men's perspectives on promoting physical activity: "We're not that difficult to figure out!".Journal of health communication · 2012Article
- Prostate cancer communication strategies recommended by older African-American men in South Carolina: a qualitative analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCriteria for evaluating the quality of cancer information on the Internet include source credibility and accuracy and currency of content. Cultural relevance of cancer resources is often overlooked in assessments of quality of Internet Web sites.
methodsInterviews with senior Aboriginal women (n = 25) were conducted in Ontario Canada to determine their beliefs about "high quality" and "credible" cancer prevention resources.
resultsParticipants did not regard online cancer information from the medical community to be completely credible. They recommended that cancer resources include contact information for traditional healers in addition to local cancer agencies.
conclusionsCultural appropriateness of cancer information should be assessed. Web resources considered credible according to published criteria may not be as relevant for Aboriginal populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17605628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.