ArticleBiophysical journal1991
Flow rate measurements in isolated perfused kidney tubules by fluorescence photobleaching recovery.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods to Measure Water Permeability.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Advanced in vitro approach to study neurovascular coupling mechanisms in the brain microcirculation.The Journal of physiology · 2012Article
- Vascular tone and neurovascular coupling: considerations toward an improved in vitro model.Frontiers in neuroenergetics · 2010Article
- Diffusion coefficients in the lateral intercellular spaces of Madin-Darby canine kidney cell epithelium determined with caged compounds.Biophysical journal · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have developed a new application of the fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR) technique for instantaneous measurement of volume flow rates at any axial position along isolated perfused kidney tubules. The method requires fast data acquisition of emitted fluorescence through a photomultiplier (time resolution, 0.5 ms) coupled with differential interference contrast microscopy to measure luminal diameters accurately. While the tubule is perfused in vitro with an impermeant fluorophore (fluorescein sulfonate), a 20-ms bleach pulse reduces the fluorescence in the observation region by 20-25%. Fluorescence recovery is a direct function of perfusate velocity; diffusion plays no significant role in the early phase of recovery. A fluid dynamics approach to data analysis shows that fractional recovery increases linearly with time until t = L/2vm, where L is the length of the observation window and vm is the mean axial velocity. Practically, a linear regression analysis of the early recovery phase allows measurement of vm of up to 0.14 cm/s, i.e., a 40-nl/min flow rate in a 25-microns-diameter tubule. Calibration experiments in small glass tubes perfused at predetermined flow rates demonstrated good accuracy (within 10%) and reproducibility (coefficient of variation, 8.7%). In rat inner medullary collecting ducts microperfused at 4-40 nl/min, the correlation with a standard fluid collection method was excellent (r2 greater than 0.97). The method should also be suitable for the direct measurement of fluid flow rate in kidney tubules or blood vessels microperfused in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.