Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17603750›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2007

A grid-search algorithm for optimal allocation of sample size in two-stage association studies.

S H Wen, C K Hsiao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S H WenDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine, Tzu-Chi University, Hualien, 97004, Taiwan. shwen@mail.tcu.edu.tw.
C K HsiaoDepartment of Public Health and Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple testing occurs commonly in genome-wide association studies with dense SNPs map. With numerous SNPs, not only the genotyping cost and time increase dramatically, many family wise error rate (FWER) controlling methods may fail for being too conservative and of less power when detecting SNPs associated with disease is of interest. Recently, several powerful two-stage strategies for multiple testing have received great attention. In this paper, we propose a grid-search algorithm for an optimal design of sample size allocation for these two-stage procedures. Two types of constraints are considered, one is the fixed overall cost and the other is the limited sample size. With the proposed optimal allocation of sample size, bearable false-positive results and larger power can be achieved to meet the limitations. The simulations indicate, as a general rule, allocating at least 80% of the total cost in stage one provides maximum power, as opposed to other methods. If per-genotyping cost in stage two differs from that in stage one, downward proportion of the total cost in earlier stage maintains good power. For limited total sample size, evaluating all the markers on 55% of the subjects in the first stage provides the maximum power while the cost reduction is approximately 43%.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenetic LinkageGenetic TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.