Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17603513›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2007

Diagnosis and treatment of transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: real progress or are we still waiting?

E D Batts, H M Lazarus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E D BattsDepartment of Medicine, Case Medical Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
H M Lazarus
University Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is an infrequent but devastating syndrome that occurs in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and is associated with a variety of transplantation-related factors, including conditioning regimens, immunosuppressive agents, GVHD and opportunistic infections. Progress in managing this condition has been hampered by lack of a consensus definition and poor understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder. Two different groups recently have proposed consensus definitions, yet they fail to distinguish the primary syndrome from the secondary causes, such as a variety of infections, medication exposure or other conditions. Increasing evidence suggests that TA-TMA is a multifactorial disorder that is distinct from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), and likely represents the final common pathway of a number of endothelial cell insults. TA-TMA responds poorly to conventional treatment for TTP, including plasma exchange, but newer agents, including daclizumab and defibrotide show promise. In addition, other agents known to modify endothelial responses to injury, including statins, prostacyclin analogues, endothelin-receptor antagonists and free radical scavengers, may lead to improved outcomes for patients affected by this disorder.

Indexed as

AdultHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansPurpura, Thrombotic ThrombocytopenicRisk FactorsThrombosisTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID17603513
OpenAlexW2052963776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.