Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17601928›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2007

Molecular karyotyping in patients with mental retardation using 100K single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Juliane Hoyer, Alexander Dreweke, Christian Becker, Ina Göhring, Christian T Thiel, Maarit M Peippo, Ralf Rauch, Michael Hofbeck, Udo Trautmann, Christiane Zweier and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Further characterization of microdeletion syndrome involving 2p15-p16.1.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2010
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliane HoyerInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Alexander Dreweke
Christian Becker
Ina Göhring
Christian T Thiel
Maarit M Peippo
Ralf Rauch
Michael Hofbeck
Udo Trautmann
Christiane Zweier
Martin Zenker
Ulrike Hüffmeier
Cornelia Kraus
Arif B Ekici
Franz Rüschendorf
Peter Nürnberg
André Reis
Anita Rauch
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEVäestöliitto · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing array techniques, it was recently shown that about 10% of patients with mental retardation of unknown origin harbour cryptic chromosomal aneusomies. However, data analysis is currently not standardised and little is known about its sensitivity and specificity.

methodsWe have developed an electronic data analysis tool for gene-mapping SNP arrays, a software tool that we call Copy Number Variation Finder (CNVF). Using CNVF, we analysed 104 unselected patients with mental retardation of unknown origin with a genechip mapping 100K SNP array and established an optimised set of analysis parameters.

resultsWe detected deletions as small as 20 kb when covered by at least three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and duplications as small as 150 kb when covered by at least six SNPs, with only one false-positive signal in six patients. In 9.1% of patients, we detected apparently disease-causing or de novo aberrations ranging in size from 0.4 to 14 Mb. Morphological anomalies in patients with de novo aberrations were equal to that of unselected patients when measured with de Vries score.

conclusionOur standardised CNVF data analysis tool is easy to use and has high sensitivity and specificity. As some genomic regions are covered more densely than others, the genome-wide resolution of the 100K array is about 400-500 kb for deletions and 900-1000 kb for duplications. The detection rate of about 10% of de novo aberrations is independent of selection of patients for particular features. The incidental finding in two patients of heterozygosity for the 250 kb recurrent deletion at the NPH1 locus, associated with autosomal recessive juvenile nephronophthisis, which was inherited from a healthy parent, highlights the fact that inherited aberrations might be disease-related even though not causal for mental retardation.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosome AberrationsGenetic TechniquesGenetic VariationGenomeHeterozygoteHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceIntellectual DisabilityKaryotypingNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID17601928
PMCPMC2597959
OpenAlexW2272864623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.