ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Implementing Single Source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Data Flow Construction and Quality Evaluation of Electronic Source Data in Clinical Trials: Pilot Study Based on Hospital Electronic Medical Records in China.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Integrating REDCap patient-reported outcomes with the HealtheIntent population health platform: proof of concept.JAMIA open · 2023Article
- Challenges and Solutions in Implementing eSource Technology for Real-World Studies in China: Qualitative Study Among Different Stakeholders.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Collaborative Program to Evaluate Real World Data for Use in Clinical Studies and Regulatory Decision Making.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023Article
- Clinical Source Data Production and Quality Control in Real-world Studies: Proposal for Development of the eSource Record System.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Clinical data for paediatric research: the Swiss approach : Proceedings of the National Symposium in Bern, Switzerland, Dec 5-6, 2019.BMC proceedings · 2021Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Coverage of the HL7AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020Article
- Integrating Medication Alert Data into a Clinical Data Repository to Enable Retrospective Study of Drug Interaction Alerts in Clinical Practice.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2017Article
- A SOA-Based Platform to Support Clinical Data Sharing.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2017Article
- Generalizable Middleware to Support Use of REDCap Dynamic Data Pull for Integrating Clinical and Research Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2017Article
- Current applications and future directions for the CDISC Operational Data Model standard: A methodological review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2016Review
- Health Information Technology: Meaningful Use and Next Steps to Improving Electronic Facilitation of Medication Adherence.JMIR medical informatics · 2016Article
- Cross border semantic interoperability for clinical research: the EHR4CR semantic resources and services.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016Article
- An Interoperability Platform Enabling Reuse of Electronic Health Records for Signal Verification Studies.BioMed research international · 2016Article
- Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM).Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- Article
- The National Institutes of Health's Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS): design, contents, functionality and experience to date.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014Article
- Comparison of two data collection processes in clinical studies: electronic and paper case report forms.BMC medical research methodology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveInefficiencies in clinical trial data collection cause delays, increase costs, and may reduce clinician participation in medical research. In this proof-of-concept study, we examine the feasibility of using point-of-care data capture for both the medical record and clinical research in the setting of a working clinical trial. We hypothesized that by doing so, we could increase reuse of patient data, eliminate redundant data entry, and minimize disruption to clinic workflow.
designWe developed and used a point-of-care electronic data capture system to record data during patient visits. The standards-based system was used for clinical research and to generate the clinic note for the medical record. The system worked in parallel with data collection procedures already in place for an ongoing multicenter clinical trial. Our system was iteratively designed after analyzing case report forms and clinic notes, and observing clinic workflow patterns and business procedures. Existing data standards from CDISC and HL7 were used for database insertion and clinical document exchange.
resultsOur system was successfully integrated into the clinic environment and used in two live test cases without disrupting existing workflow. Analyses performed during system design yielded detailed information on practical issues affecting implementation of systems that automatically extract, store, and reuse healthcare data.
conclusionAlthough subject to the limitations of a small feasibility study, our study demonstrates that electronic patient data can be reused for prospective multicenter clinical research and patient care, and demonstrates a need for further development of therapeutic area standards that can facilitate researcher use of healthcare data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.