ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2007
Parallel magnetic resonance imaging.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of finger-pulse triggering as a substitute for electrocardiogram triggering in cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping: a prospective comparative study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic Characterization of Peripheral Arterio-Venous Malformations Using Rapid Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Derivative encoding for parallel magnetic resonance imaging.Medical physics · 2011Article
- Spinal cord lesions and clinical status in multiple sclerosis: A 1.5 T and 3 T MRI study.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parallel MRI started with the introduction of coil arrays in improving radiofrequency (RF) acquisition (what is called parallel imaging) and continued with an analogous development for RF transmission (parallel transmission). Based on differences in the spatial sensitivity distributions of the involved array elements, both techniques try to shorten the respective k-space trajectory. Parallel imaging refers to the acquisition of k-space data, whereas parallel transmission is dealing with the deposition of RF energy packages in the excitation k-space. However, parallel transmission is not simply the reciprocal of parallel imaging. The main goal of parallel imaging is the shortening of the acquisition time. The main goal of parallel transmission is the shortening of the pulse duration of spatially selective RF pulses. The present article describes the basic concept, the state of the art, and the similarities and differences of both technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.