Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17599166›Full record

ArticlePrimary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry2007

Changing the course of Alzheimer's disease: anti-amyloid disease-modifying treatments on the horizon.

Daniel D Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. NGP 555, a γ-Secretase Modulator, Lowers the Amyloid Biomarker, AβAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2017
    Article
  5. Alzheimer disease.Disease-a-month : DM · 2010
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel D ChristensenDepartments of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Pharmacology, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. daniel.christensen@hsc.utah.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the amyloid hypothesis as the predominant mechanistic theory of Alzheimer's disease and update the status of new disease-modifying, anti-amyloid treatments in clinical development. DATA SOURCES: Governmental Web sites and those of professional Alzheimer's disease associations and drug manufacturers were searched for new drugs in development. An English-language search of PubMed (January 2003-January 2006) was conducted using the search terms Alzheimer's disease and amyloid hypothesis and each of the drugs and immunotherapies from the 4 identified classes of anti-amyloid, disease-modifying therapies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies and reports were selected on the basis of recent publication, adequate methodology, and completeness of data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Immunotherapy, γ-secretase inhibitors, selective neurotoxic aggregated 42-amino acid peptide subspecies of amyloid β (Aβ₄₂)-lowering agents (tarenflurbil), inhibitors of amyloid aggregation (tramiprosate), and statins show promise in clinical trials. Safety remains an important factor. Disease-modifying drugs that specifically target the amyloid cascade and do not interact with essential biological pathways are expected to possess a lower rate of unintended adverse events.Agents that selectively target Aβ₄₂ production (e.g., tarenflurbil), block Aβ aggregation (e.g., tramiprosate), or enhance alpha-secretase activity (statins) offer hope for disease modification and prevention and do not appear to interfere with other biological pathways.

conclusionsDiscovery of safe and effective disease-modifying therapies will usher in a new age of Alzheimer's disease treatment.

Identifiers

PMID17599166
PMCPMC1894844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.