Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17598079›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2007

[Priming technique with cisatracurium Onset time at the laryngeal muscles].

J Schmidt, S Albrecht, N Petterich, J Fechner, P Klein, A Irouschek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SchmidtAnästhesiologische Klinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen. joachim.schmidt@kfa.imed.uni-erlangen.de
S Albrecht
N Petterich
J Fechner
P Klein
A Irouschek
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePriming can significantly shorten the onset of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NNBA) measured at the adductor pollicis muscle (APM). In spite of the known risks, priming is very popular especially in cases where NNBAs with a long onset time are used. However, there are no data regarding the onset of action for a priming technique measured at the laryngeal muscles although these muscles are of great importance for conditions of intubation and patient safety. The aim of this study was to compare a bolus application and a priming technique with respect to the laryngeal onset time and peak effect. PATIENT AND

methodsAfter approval of the local ethics committee and written informed consent, 36 patients undergoing elective thyroid surgery were enrolled in the study. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with a target controlled infusion of propofol (target concentration 2.7-6.0 microg/ml) and infusion of remifentanil (0.25-0.75 microg/kgbw/min). After loss of consciousness, a tube with a surface electrode was placed into the trachea without the application of any neuromuscular blocking agent. Neuromuscular monitoring consisted of evoked electromyography (EMG) of the laryngeal adductor muscles via the surface electrode and evoked acceleromyography (TOF Guard) of the right adductor pollicis muscle (APM). After transcutaneous stimulation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and ulnar nerve, either 0.9% NaCl followed by 0.1 mg/kgbw cisatracurium after 3 min (bolus group, n=12), a priming dose of 0.01 mg/kgbw cisatracurium followed by 0.09 mg/kgbw 3 min later (low dose priming group, n=12) or a priming dose of 0.015 mg/kgbw cisatracurium followed by cisatracurium 0.085 mg/kgbw 3 min later (high dose priming group, n=12) were injected. Lag time, onset time and peak effect of NMB were recorded and compared between the groups.

resultsDemographic data, lag time and peak effect were comparable between the three groups. Onset time at the laryngeal muscles was significantly shorter in the high dose priming group (80+/-17 s), when compared to the low dose priming group (128+/-23 s) and bolus group (142+/-29 s). Onset time at the APM was also significantly shorter in the high dose priming group (154+/-35 s), when compared with the bolus group (226+/-76 s). The recovery of the neuromuscular function measured at the APM showed no differences between the groups.

conclusionOur results show that only high dose priming of cisatracurium can significantly shorten the laryngeal onset time. However, clinical routine use is not recommended due to possible side-effects.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAdolescentAdultAgedAnesthetics, IntravenousAtracuriumBody Mass IndexElectric StimulationElectromyographyFemaleHumansLaryngeal MusclesMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsAnesthetics, IntravenousAtracuriumcisatracuriumNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsPropofol

Identifiers

PMID17598079
OpenAlexW1571307209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.