Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17597531›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2007

Definition of the zebrafish genome using flow cytometry and cytogenetic mapping.

Jennifer L Freeman, Adeola Adeniyi, Ruby Banerjee, Stephanie Dallaire, Sean F Maguire, Jianxiang Chi, Bee Ling Ng, Cinthya Zepeda, Carol E Scott, Sean Humphray and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The hybrid history of zebrafish.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Lampbrush chromosomes of Danio rerio.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Atrazine exposure elicits copy number alterations in the zebrafish genome.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Extensive genetic diversity and substructuring among zebrafish strains revealed through copy number variant analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jennifer L FreemanDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. jfreeman7@partners.org <jfreeman7@partners.org>
Adeola Adeniyi
Ruby Banerjee
Stephanie Dallaire
Sean F Maguire
Jianxiang Chi
Bee Ling Ng
Cinthya Zepeda
Carol E Scott
Sean Humphray
Jane Rogers
Yi Zhou
Leonard I Zon
Nigel P Carter
Fengtang Yang
Charles Lee
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Molecular Cytogenetic Tools for the ZebrafishR01CA111560 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, CHARLES · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111560NCI NIH HHS R01-CA111560Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe zebrafish (Danio rerio) is an important vertebrate model organism system for biomedical research. The syntenic conservation between the zebrafish and human genome allows one to investigate the function of human genes using the zebrafish model. To facilitate analysis of the zebrafish genome, genetic maps have been constructed and sequence annotation of a reference zebrafish genome is ongoing. However, the duplicative nature of teleost genomes, including the zebrafish, complicates accurate assembly and annotation of a representative genome sequence. Cytogenetic approaches provide "anchors" that can be integrated with accumulating genomic data.

resultsHere, we cytogenetically define the zebrafish genome by first estimating the size of each linkage group (LG) chromosome using flow cytometry, followed by the cytogenetic mapping of 575 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones onto metaphase chromosomes. Of the 575 BAC clones, 544 clones localized to apparently unique chromosomal locations. 93.8% of these clones were assigned to a specific LG chromosome location using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and compared to the LG chromosome assignment reported in the zebrafish genome databases. Thirty-one BAC clones localized to multiple chromosomal locations in several different hybridization patterns. From these data, a refined second generation probe panel for each LG chromosome was also constructed.

conclusionThe chromosomal mapping of the 575 large-insert DNA clones allows for these clones to be integrated into existing zebrafish mapping data. An accurately annotated zebrafish reference genome serves as a valuable resource for investigating the molecular basis of human diseases using zebrafish mutant models.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCytogeneticsFlow CytometryGenetic TechniquesGenomic LibraryGenomicsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, GeneticTelomereZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID17597531
PMCPMC1925092
OpenAlexW1999342269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.