Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17597402›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2008

Phase-II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with metastatic biliary and gallbladder cancer.

Jeffrey A Meyerhardt, Andrew X Zhu, Keith Stuart, David P Ryan, Lawrence Blaszkowsky, Nicole Lehman, Craig C Earle, Matthew H Kulke, Pankaj Bhargava, Charles S Fuchs

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Gemcitabine with carboplatin for advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II single institution study.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2010
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancer.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gallbladder Cancer in the 21st Century.Journal of oncology · 2015
    Review
  15. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for gall bladder cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2014
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. New insights on cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2010
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey A MeyerhardtDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA. jmeyerhardt@partners.org
Andrew X Zhu
Keith Stuart
David P Ryan
Lawrence Blaszkowsky
Nicole Lehman
Craig C Earle
Matthew H Kulke
Pankaj Bhargava
Charles S Fuchs
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USHadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no standard chemotherapy option for patients with biliary tract cancers. These patients present fairly ill and can have a rapid progression of disease. We conducted a multi-center, phase-II trial for patients with locally unresectable or metastatic bile duct or gallbladder adenocarcinomas using a modified regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin to potentially improve tolerability. Patients received a 21-day treatment cycle of gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin at 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. To participate, 33 patients signed informed consent, and 30 patients received at least one dose of chemotherapy. By intention-to-treat analyses, 7 patients (21%) experienced a partial response and another 12 (36%) had stable disease for at least 12 weeks. The median progression-free survival was 6.3 months and median overall survival was 9.7 months. After 1 year, 39% of patients were alive. Most common grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (23%), anemia (20%), nausea (20%), emesis (13%) and fatigue (10%). Of note, 52% of patients withdrew from study treatment, principally due to treatment-related adverse events. We concluded that this modified regimen appeared to have comparable activity to other gemcitabine and cisplatin regimens against advanced bile duct and gallbladder cancers, but there was still moderate toxicity in this patient population.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID17597402
OpenAlexW1996520070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.