ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2007
Differences in age-related bone mass of proximal femur between Chinese women and different ethnic women in the United States.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Premenopausal and postmenopausal differences in bone microstructure and mechanical competence in Chinese-American and white women.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2013Trial
- Prevalence of fracture and osteoporosis risk factors in American Indian and Alaska Native people.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2012Article
- Higher body mass, older age and higher monounsaturated fatty acids intake reflect better quantitative ultrasound parameters in Inuit preschoolers.International journal of circumpolar health · 2012Article
- Epidemiology and structural basis of racial differences in fragility fractures in Chinese and Caucasians.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012Review
- Bone health in immigrant Hispanic women living in Texas.Journal of community health · 2010Article
- Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2009Article
- Risks factors for low bone mineral density in pre-menopausal Mexican women with systemic lupus erythematosus.Clinical rheumatology · 2009Article
- Bone mass in schoolchildren in Brazil: the effect of racial miscegenation, pubertal stage, and socioeconomic differences.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2009Article
- Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Substantial racial differences in bone mass and bone loss rate have been reported, but the extent of the difference between native Chinese women and women of different races in the United States is not clear. We used a DXA bone densitometer to measure bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), bone area (BA), and volumetric BMD (vBMD) in different regions of the proximal femur in 3614 Chinese women aged 20 years and older. Regression models were chosen to best fit the changes of these parameters with increasing age. The values in their fitted curves were determined by the Cartesian coordinate numeration system. Subsequently, we compared these fitted curves to full-matched data of non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, and Mexican American women reported by the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). We found that all fitted curves of bone mass of non-Hispanic black women were significantly higher than those of Chinese, non-Hispanic white, and Mexican American women (P = 0.000). The BMD and BMC fitted curves in various regions of the hip for non-Hispanic blacks were 22%-28% and 26%-43% higher than those for Chinese women, 8.3%-13% and 7.9%-9.5% higher than those for non-Hispanic whites, and 8.8%-10% and 13%-19% higher than those for Mexican Americans, respectively. However, when the expression of difference was transformed from BMD to vBMD at the femoral neck, the difference between Chinese and non-Hispanic black women was reduced from 22% to 18% and that between Chinese and non-Hispanic white women from 7.4% to 0.8%, but the difference increased from 3.2% to 9.6% between non-Hispanic white and Mexican American women and from 13% to 17% between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black women. By the age of 80 years, the accumulated bone loss rate in various regions of the proximal femur for Chinese, Mexican Americans, non-Hispanic whites, and non-Hispanic blacks were -38.9% +/- 1.8%, -34.4% +/- 3.1%, -27.8% +/- 5.9%, and -28.4% +/- 4.8%, respectively. In conclusion, bone mass in the proximal femur of native Chinese women is significantly lower, and the bone loss rate greater, than those of non-Asian women in the United States. At the femoral neck, the vBMD of Chinese women is similar to that of non-Hispanic white women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.