Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17592503›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2007

Thermodynamic analysis of ligands at cholecystokinin CCK2 receptors in rat cerebral cortex.

E A Harper, S P Roberts, S B Kalindjian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E A HarperJames Black Foundation, 68 Half Moon Lane, Dulwich, London, UK. elaine.harper@kcl.ac.uk
S P Roberts
S B Kalindjian
University of Greenwich · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSeveral studies using radioligand binding assays, have shown that measurement of thermodynamic parameters can allow discrimination of agonists and antagonists (Weiland et al., 1979; Borea et al., 1996a). Here we investigate whether agonists and antagonists can be thermodynamically discriminated at CCK(2) receptors in rat cerebral cortex. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The pK(L) of [(3)H]-JB93182 in rat cerebral cortex membranes was determined at 4, 12, 21 and 37 degrees C in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (buffer B pH 6.96; containing 0.089 mM bacitracin). pK(I) values of ligands of diverse chemical structure and with differing intrinsic activity (alpha), as defined by the lumen-perfused rat and mouse stomach bioassays, were determined in buffer B at 4, 12, 21 and 37 degrees C. KEY

results[(3)H]-JB93182 labelled a homogeneous population of receptors in rat cerebral cortex at 4, 12, 21 and 37 degrees C and the pK(L) and B(max) were not altered by incubation temperature. [(3)H]-JB93182 binding reached equilibrium after 10, 50, 90 and 220 min at 37, 21, 12 and 4 degrees C, respectively. pK(I) values for R-L-365,260, R-L-740,093, YM220, PD134,308 and JB95008 were higher at 4 degrees C than at 37 degrees C. There was no effect of temperature on pK(I) values for pentagastrin, CCK-8S, S-L-365,260, YM022, PD140,376 and JB93242. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CCK(2) receptor agonists and antagonists at rat CCK(2) receptors cannot be discriminated by thermodynamic analysis using [(3)H]-JB93182 as the radioligand.

Indexed as

ThermodynamicsAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBiological AssayCerebral CortexIndolesLigandsMaleMiceRadioligand AssayRadiopharmaceuticalsRatsRats, WistarReceptor, Cholecystokinin BTemperatureIndolesJB93182LigandsRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Cholecystokinin B

Identifiers

PMID17592503
PMCPMC2189820
OpenAlexW1487796133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.