Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17591932›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2007

Amplification patterns of three genomic regions predict distant recurrence in breast carcinoma.

Lisa M Davis, Cole Harris, Lei Tang, Patti Doherty, Peter Hraber, Yumiko Sakai, Therese Bocklage, Katie Doeden, Bryan Hall, John Alsobrook and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Circadian gene variants in cancer.Annals of medicine · 2014
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Predictive and prognostic molecular markers for cancer medicine.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lisa M DavisExagen Diagnostics, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Cole Harris
Lei Tang
Patti Doherty
Peter Hraber
Yumiko Sakai
Therese Bocklage
Katie Doeden
Bryan Hall
John Alsobrook
Ian Rabinowitz
Thomas M Williams
John Hozier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently used clinical and histopathological parameters imprecisely define the risk of distant recurrence in breast cancer, underscoring the need for more informative prognostic markers. In the present fluorescence in situ hybridization study of archived surgical specimens, we derived an algorithm for computing a prognostic index (PI) from DNA copy numbers of three genomic regions (CYP24, PDCD6IP, and BIRC5) for estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive (ER/PR+) cancers and a distinct PI (based on NR1D1, SMARCE1, and BIRC5) for estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative (ER/PR-) cancers. Among independent test cases stratified by PI, recurrence rates were significantly higher among high-risk patients than low-risk patients for both ER/PR+ (odds ratio = 9.52, 95% confidence interval >2.12, P = 0.0024) and ER/PR- (odds ratio = 12.3, 95% confidence interval >1.45, P = 0.0188) cancers. Among the entire population, recurrences were significantly more prevalent for cases with PI above the medians for both ER/PR+ (Fisher's exact, P = 1.19 x 10(-5)) and ER/PR- (P = 0.0025) patients and for the node-negative subsets (ER/PR+ node-negative, P = 0.042 and ER/PR- node-negative, P = 0.039). In conclusion, these markers perform well in comparison with other criteria for recurrence risk assessment and can be used with routinely formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgical specimens.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene DosageGenome, HumanHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID17591932
PMCPMC1899419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.