Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17591849›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

In vivo efficacy of ceftaroline (PPI-0903), a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, compared with linezolid and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit endocarditis model.

Cédric Jacqueline, Jocelyne Caillon, Virginie Le Mabecque, Anne-Françoise Miègeville, Antoine Hamel, Denis Bugnon, James Yigong Ge, Gilles Potel

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ceftaroline fosamil: a brief clinical review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2013
    Article
  13. Management of MRSA/GISA, VISA Endocarditis.Current infectious disease reports · 2013
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Vancomycin versus linezolid in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus meningitis in an experimental rabbit model.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2012
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cédric JacquelineUniversité de Nantes, Nantes Atlantique Universités, Thérapeutiques Cliniques et Expérimentales des Infections, EA3826, UFR Médecine, Nantes, France.
Jocelyne Caillon
Virginie Le Mabecque
Anne-Françoise Miègeville
Antoine Hamel
Denis Bugnon
James Yigong Ge
Gilles Potel
Nantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the rabbit endocarditis model, we compared the activity of a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftaroline, with those of linezolid and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. After a 4-day treatment, ceftaroline exhibited superior bactericidal in vivo activity against resistant S. aureus strains and appeared to be the most effective drug against a heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus strain.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveCeftarolineCephalosporinsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidColony Count, MicrobialEndocarditis, BacterialImmunoenzyme TechniquesLinezolidMethicillin ResistanceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxazolidinonesRabbitsStaphylococcal InfectionsAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporinsLinezolidOxazolidinonesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID17591849
PMCPMC2043200
OpenAlexW2109417549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.