Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17591798›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2007

Differential effects of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and indole on Escherichia coli O157:H7 chemotaxis, colonization, and gene expression.

Tarun Bansal, Derek Englert, Jintae Lee, Manjunath Hegde, Thomas K Wood, Arul Jayaraman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 346 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Indole decreases the virulence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. EnterohemorrhagicmSystems · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Indole signaling inGut microbes · 2025
    Review
  10. Response ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A cell-cell communication signal fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  19. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tarun BansalArtie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, 200 Jack E. Brown Engineering, 3122 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3122, USA.
Derek Englert
Jintae Lee
Manjunath Hegde
Thomas K Wood
Arul Jayaraman
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Plant Biofilm Inhibitors to Discover Biofilm GenesR01EB003872 · NIBIB · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI WOOD, THOMAS K · 2005 to 2008
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB003872-01NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During infection in the gastrointestinal tract, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 is exposed to a wide range of signaling molecules, including the eukaryotic hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine, and bacterial signal molecules such as indole. Since these signaling molecules have been shown to be involved in the regulation of phenotypes such as motility and virulence that are crucial for EHEC infections, we hypothesized that these molecules also govern the initial recognition of the large intestine environment and attachment to the host cell surface. Here, we report that, compared to indole, epinephrine and norepinephrine exert divergent effects on EHEC chemotaxis, motility, biofilm formation, gene expression, and colonization of HeLa cells. Using a novel two-fluorophore chemotaxis assay, it was found that EHEC is attracted to epinephrine and norepinephrine while it is repelled by indole. In addition, epinephrine and norepinephrine also increased EHEC motility and biofilm formation while indole attenuated these phenotypes. DNA microarray analysis of surface-associated EHEC indicated that epinephrine/norepinephrine up-regulated the expression of genes involved in surface colonization and virulence while exposure to indole decreased their expression. The gene expression data also suggested that autoinducer 2 uptake was repressed upon exposure to epinephrine/norepinephrine but not indole. In vitro adherence experiments confirmed that epinephrine and norepinephrine increased attachment to epithelial cells while indole decreased adherence. Taken together, these results suggest that epinephrine and norepinephrine increase EHEC infection while indole attenuates the process.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisEpinephrineEscherichia coli O157Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialHeLa CellsHumansIndolesNorepinephrineOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSignal TransductionEpinephrineindoleIndolesNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID17591798
PMCPMC1951185
OpenAlexW2133900508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.