Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17589606›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2007

Improving indoor environmental quality for public health: impediments and policy recommendations.

Felicia Wu, David Jacobs, Clifford Mitchell, David Miller, Meryl H Karol

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Update onBiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Housing conditions and respiratory morbidity in Indigenous children in remote communities in Northwestern Ontario, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Engineering the oleaginous yeastBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Distribution features of biological hazardous pollutants in residential environments in Korea.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Felicia WuUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA. fwu@eoh.pitt.edu
David Jacobs
Clifford Mitchell
David Miller
Meryl H Karol
University of Pittsburgh · USCarleton University · CAJohns Hopkins University · USNational Center for Healthy Housing · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople in modern societies spend more than 90% of their time indoors. Hence, indoor environmental quality (IEQ) has a significant impact on public health. In this article we describe health risks associated with indoor environments, illuminate barriers to overcoming these risks, and provide policy recommendations to achieve healthier indoor environments.

objectivesThe weight of evidence suggests that indoor environmental contaminants pose significant public health risks, particularly among children and the poor, and the societal costs of illnesses related to indoor environments are considerable. Despite the evidence of harm to human health, poor indoor environments are generally difficult to regulate and not of sufficient concern to the general public. We discuss several reasons for this lack of concern about IEQ, focusing specifically on home environments. DISCUSSION: Economics plays a large role both in political inaction and individual-level indifference. Because little effort has been made to quantify the value of the societal and individual costs of poor housing quality, as well as the benefits achievable by simple interventions, policymakers lack motivation to act on IEQ. Similarly, individual homeowners lack the incentive to remediate homes, as other problems may be more pressing than home environmental quality.

conclusionsAlthough the problem of IEQ involves multiple stakeholders and multiple levels of governance, it is possible to establish economic incentives that would set the wheels in motion for action at all levels to achieve healthy home environments. Also important are education and information dissemination on the public health risks associated with indoor environments. These recommendations are intended for all decision makers who have an influence in developing policy to improve indoor environmental quality.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposurePublic PolicyAir Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental IllnessHealth EducationHousingHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID17589606
PMCPMC1892115
OpenAlexW1967485812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.