ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2007
How to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the association between occupational exposure to asbestos and ovarian carcinoma: results from a pilot study in Germany.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Shift work and cognitive impairment in later life - results of a cross-sectional pilot study testing the feasibility of a large-scale epidemiologic investigation.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Reporting of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids in the primary dental care setting in Scotland: an evaluation of current practice and attitudes.British dental journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
data sourcesFourteen electronic databases were searched, namely Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) PsycLit, Dissertation Abstracts, Medline, Embase, Social Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index, Social Psychological Educational Criminological Trials Register, EconLit, Sociological Abstracts, Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings, and National Research Register. Literature reviews and meta-analyses were inspected for eligible trials and two journals (Public Opinion Quarterly and American Journal of Epidemiology) were searched by hand. STUDY SELECTION: Studies included were randomised controlled trials of methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data describing trial participants, intervention, number of individuals randomised to intervention and comparison groups, and allocation concealment was extracted. For each strategy, pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals in a random-effects model were estimated. Evidence for selection bias was assessed using Egger's weighted regression method, Begg's rank correlation test and funnel plots. Heterogeneity in trial odds ratios was assessed using a chi-square test at a 5% significance level and the degree of inconsistency between trial results was quantified using the I(2) statistic (The I(2) statistic measures the proportion of the variation across studies that is because of heterogeneity. It is calculated by dividing the heterogeneity chi-square minus the number of degrees of freedom by the heterogeneity chi-square, and then multiplying by 100.).
resultsFrom 372 eligible trials that were included, 98 different ways of increasing response rates to postal questionnaires were evaluated. For 62 of these strategies, the combined trials included over 1000 participants. There was substantial heterogeneity in the trial results from half of the strategies. Strategies found to response are shown in table 1, while three strategies were found to decrease response, questionnaire included questions of a sensitive nature (odds ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00; heterogeneity P =0.51; I(2) 0%), questionnaires began with the most general questions (odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.96; heterogeneity Not calculated), Participants were offered the opportunity to opt out of the study (odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89; heterogeneity P =0.46, I2 0%).
conclusionsHealth researchers using postal questionnaires can increase response rates using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.
Identifiers
17589494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.