Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17589494›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2007

How to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.

Derek Richards

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Derek RichardsCentre for Evidence-based Dentistry, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

data sourcesFourteen electronic databases were searched, namely Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) PsycLit, Dissertation Abstracts, Medline, Embase, Social Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index, Social Psychological Educational Criminological Trials Register, EconLit, Sociological Abstracts, Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings, and National Research Register. Literature reviews and meta-analyses were inspected for eligible trials and two journals (Public Opinion Quarterly and American Journal of Epidemiology) were searched by hand. STUDY SELECTION: Studies included were randomised controlled trials of methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data describing trial participants, intervention, number of individuals randomised to intervention and comparison groups, and allocation concealment was extracted. For each strategy, pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals in a random-effects model were estimated. Evidence for selection bias was assessed using Egger's weighted regression method, Begg's rank correlation test and funnel plots. Heterogeneity in trial odds ratios was assessed using a chi-square test at a 5% significance level and the degree of inconsistency between trial results was quantified using the I(2) statistic (The I(2) statistic measures the proportion of the variation across studies that is because of heterogeneity. It is calculated by dividing the heterogeneity chi-square minus the number of degrees of freedom by the heterogeneity chi-square, and then multiplying by 100.).

resultsFrom 372 eligible trials that were included, 98 different ways of increasing response rates to postal questionnaires were evaluated. For 62 of these strategies, the combined trials included over 1000 participants. There was substantial heterogeneity in the trial results from half of the strategies. Strategies found to response are shown in table 1, while three strategies were found to decrease response, questionnaire included questions of a sensitive nature (odds ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00; heterogeneity P =0.51; I(2) 0%), questionnaires began with the most general questions (odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.96; heterogeneity Not calculated), Participants were offered the opportunity to opt out of the study (odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89; heterogeneity P =0.46, I2 0%).

conclusionsHealth researchers using postal questionnaires can increase response rates using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.

Identifiers

PMID17589494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.