Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17588935›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2007

Markers and methods for cell sorting of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural cell populations.

Jan Pruszak, Kai-Christian Sonntag, Moe Hein Aung, Rosario Sanchez-Pernaute, Ole Isacson

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The quest of cell surface markers for stem cell therapy.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan PruszakCenter for Neuroregeneration Research, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts 02478, USA.
Kai-Christian Sonntag
Moe Hein Aung
Rosario Sanchez-Pernaute
Ole Isacson

Funding

Transplantation of ES Cell-derived DA Neurons into PD Primate ModelsP50NS039793 · NINDS · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI ISACSON, OLE · 1999 to 2010
$16.3M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-39793NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS039793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural cells differentiated in vitro from human embryonic stem cells (hESC) exhibit broad cellular heterogeneity with respect to developmental stage and lineage specification. Here, we describe standard conditions for the use and discovery of markers for analysis and cell selection of hESC undergoing neuronal differentiation. To generate better-defined cell populations, we established a working protocol for sorting heterogeneous hESC-derived neural cell populations by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Using genetically labeled synapsin-green fluorescent protein-positive hESC-derived neurons as a proof of principle, we enriched viable differentiated neurons by FACS. Cell sorting methodology using surface markers was developed, and a comprehensive profiling of surface antigens was obtained for immature embryonic stem cell types (such as stage-specific embryonic antigen [SSEA]-3, -4, TRA-1-81, TRA-1-60), neural stem and precursor cells (such as CD133, SSEA-1 [CD15], A2B5, forebrain surface embryonic antigen-1, CD29, CD146, p75 [CD271]), and differentiated neurons (such as CD24 or neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM; CD56]). At later stages of neural differentiation, NCAM (CD56) was used to isolate hESC-derived neurons by FACS. Such FACS-sorted hESC-derived neurons survived in vivo after transplantation into rodent brain. These results and concepts provide (a) a feasible approach for experimental cell sorting of differentiated neurons, (b) an initial survey of surface antigens present during neural differentiation of hESC, and (c) a framework for developing cell selection strategies for neural cell-based therapies.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAntigens, SurfaceBiomarkersCells, CulturedCell SeparationEmbryonic Stem CellsFlow CytometryHumansModels, BiologicalNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesNeuronsStaining and Labelingantigen FORSE-1Antigens, SurfaceBiomarkersNeural Cell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID17588935
PMCPMC2238728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.