Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17588724›Full record

ArticleMechanisms of development

Split ends antagonizes the Notch and potentiates the EGFR signaling pathways during Drosophila eye development.

David B Doroquez, Terry L Orr-Weaver, Ilaria Rebay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mechanisms of development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. spenito is required for sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David B DoroquezWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Terry L Orr-Weaver
Ilaria Rebay
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Cell-Cell Signaling In Embryonic and Retinal Development-Revised RenewalR01EY012549 · NEI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI Ilaria Rebay · 1999 to 2026
$7.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012549NEI NIH HHS R01 EY12549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Notch and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways interact cooperatively and antagonistically to regulate many aspects of Drosophila development, including the eye. How output from these two signaling networks is fine-tuned to achieve the precise balance needed for specific inductive interactions and patterning events remains an open and important question. Previously, we reported that the gene split ends (spen) functions within or parallel to the EGFR pathway during midline glial cell development in the embryonic central nervous system. Here, we report that the cellular defects caused by loss of spen function in the developing eye imaginal disc place spen as both an antagonist of the Notch pathway and a positive contributor to EGFR signaling during retinal cell differentiation. Specifically, loss of spen results in broadened expression of Scabrous, ectopic activation of Notch signaling, and a corresponding reduction in Atonal expression at the morphogenetic furrow. Consistent with Spen's role in antagonizing Notch signaling, reduction of spen levels is sufficient to suppress Notch-dependent phenotypes. At least in part due to loss of Spen-dependent down-regulation of Notch signaling, loss of spen also dampens EGFR signaling as evidenced by reduced activity of MAP kinase (MAPK). This reduced MAPK activity in turn leads to a failure to limit expression of the EGFR pathway antagonist and the ETS-domain transcriptional repressor Yan and to a corresponding loss of cell fate specification in spen mutant ommatidia. We propose that Spen plays a role in modulating output from the Notch and EGFR pathways to ensure appropriate patterning during eye development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody PatterningDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsErbB ReceptorsEyeHomeodomain ProteinsNuclear ProteinsReceptors, NotchRNA-Binding ProteinsSignal TransductionUp-RegulationWings, AnimalDrosophila ProteinsErbB ReceptorsHomeodomain ProteinsN protein, DrosophilaNuclear ProteinsReceptors, NotchRNA-Binding ProteinsSpen protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID17588724
PMCPMC2231642
OpenAlexW1991985148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.