Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17588353›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2007

Transitions to palliation: two solitudes or inevitable integration?

Daniel Rayson, Paul McIntyre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Standardizing integration of palliative care into comprehensive cancer therapy--a disease specific approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  5. The coordination of primary and oncology specialty care at the end of life.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2010
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel RaysonDivision of Medical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 2Y9. daniel.rayson@cdha.nshealth.ca
Paul McIntyre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As options for systemic therapy for cancer continue to expand and median survival for many solid tumors lengthens, the divisions between active oncologic and palliative care continue to blur. Despite the well-recognized need to integrate palliative support for those with metastatic cancer, data on best practices facilitating the transition from active oncologic to active palliative care are lacking. Recent evidence outlining evolving issues surrounding this transition in care is reviewed, emphasizing the need for rigorous research efforts to define best practices and interventions.

Indexed as

CaregiversHumansNeoplasmsPalliative CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentTerminal CareTerminally Ill

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.