Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17587562›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2007

Structural genomics: keeping up with expanding knowledge of the protein universe.

Marek Grabowski, Andrzej Joachimiak, Zbyszek Otwinowski, Wladek Minor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 'Seeding' with protease to optimize protein crystallization conditions in in situ proteolysis.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Benefits of structural genomics for drug discovery research.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2009
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Iron-sulfur protein folds, iron-sulfur chemistry, and evolution.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marek GrabowskiDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Andrzej Joachimiak
Zbyszek Otwinowski
Wladek Minor

Funding

The Midwest Center for Structural GenomicsU54GM074942 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOACHIMIAK, ANDRZEJ · 2005 to 2009
$51.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM074942NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural characterization of the protein universe is the main mission of Structural Genomics (SG) programs. However, progress in gene sequencing technology, set in motion in the 1990s, has resulted in rapid expansion of protein sequence space--a twelvefold increase in the past seven years. For the SG field, this creates new challenges and necessitates a re-assessment of its strategies. Nevertheless, despite the growth of sequence space, at present nearly half of the content of the Swiss-Prot database and over 40% of Pfam protein families can be structurally modeled based on structures determined so far, with SG projects making an increasingly significant contribution. The SG contribution of new Pfam structures nearly doubled from 27.2% in 2003 to 51.6% in 2006.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsDatabases, ProteinHumansProtein FoldingProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID17587562
PMCPMC2885969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.