Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17587486›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2007

A portable real-time ultrasonic bone densitometer.

Jonathan J Kaufman, Gangming Luo, Robert S Siffert

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Beginner's Guide for Using Bone in Marine Mammal Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ultrasonic assessment of the radius in vitro.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2008
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan J KaufmanDepartment of Orthopedics, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10012, USA. jjkaufman@cyberlogic.org
Gangming Luo
Robert S Siffert
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York University · US

Funding

A NEW SYSTEM FOR ULTRASONIC ASSESSMENT OF THE CALCANEUSR44AR064113 · NIAMS · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
A New System for Ultrasonic Bone AssessmentR44AR045150 · NIAMS · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 2002 to 2003
$861k
Clinical 3D Ultrasonic Assessment of the PhalangesR43AG027722 · NIA · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 2005 to 2005
$100k
NIAMS NIH HHS 2 R44 AR45150NIAMS NIH HHS R44 AR045150NIAMS NIH HHS R44 AR064113NIA NIH HHS 1 R43 AG027722NIA NIH HHS R43 AG027722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to develop a novel ultrasound device to estimate bone mineral density (BMD) at the calcaneus. The device is entirely self-contained, portable (<or=1 kg) and handheld and permits real-time evaluation of the BMD by computing a parameter known as net time delay (NTD). The NTD is defined as the difference between the transit time through the heel of an ultrasound signal and the transit time through a hypothetical object of equal thickness (to the heel) but containing soft tissue only. This parameter is sensitive primarily to the total amount (i.e., the average total thickness) of bone contained in the propagation path, and thus is equivalent to the bone mineral content estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners, and to the (areal) BMD when normalized by transducer area. Computer simulations of ultrasound propagation were used to study the relationship between NTD and BMD. The simulations used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images of a set of 10 calcaneal bone cores, which were further processed by morphologic image processing to obtain a set of 30 "samples" with BMDs ranging from 0.25 to 1.83 g/cm2. The NTD and BMD were found to be very highly correlated (r=0.99), demonstrating the high sensitivity of NTD to bone mass. A clinical institutional review board-approved study measured 85 adult women at the heel. BMD was measured at the same time using DXA. A linear regression using NTD produced a linear correlation coefficient of 0.86, which represents a significant improvement over present ultrasound bone densitometers, but not nearly as good as the simulation results. Reasons for this have been identified (viz., errors in distance measurement and lack of coincidence between the DXA and ultrasound regions of interest), and a new device and experimental protocol to deal with these sources of error has been developed and is currently under clinical trials. It is expected that this should improve the correlation between NTD and BMD even further (>or=0.9), effectively making the former parameter a proxy for the latter. In conclusion, although X-ray methods are effective in bone mass assessment, osteoporosis remains one of the largest undiagnosed and under-diagnosed diseases in the world today. The research described here, in conjunction with the fact that the devices are designed to be manufactured at very low cost (approximately $400 USD), should enable the significant expansion of diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

UltrasonicsAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone DensityCalcaneusComputer SimulationEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID17587486
PMCPMC2063447
OpenAlexW2136386884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.