ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2007
A portable real-time ultrasonic bone densitometer.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Beginner's Guide for Using Bone in Marine Mammal Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Guideline
- In Vivo Ultrasonographic Assessment of Bone Mineral Density and Its Impact on Semen Quality in Boars.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Identification of novel variants and candidate genes associated with porcine bone mineral density using genome-wide association study.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020Review
- Nonlinear attenuation and dispersion in human calcaneus in vitro: statistical validation and relationships to microarchitecture.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015Article
- Clinical assessment of the 1/3 radius using a new desktop ultrasonic bone densitometer.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2013Article
- Prediction of trabecular bone principal structural orientation using quantitative ultrasound scanning.Journal of biomechanics · 2012Article
- Cancellous bone analysis with modified least squares Prony's method and chirp filter: phantom experiments and simulation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2010Article
- Decomposition of two-component ultrasound pulses in cancellous bone using modified least squares prony method--phantom experiment and simulation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2010Article
- Ultrasonic assessment of the radius in vitro.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2008Article
- Ultrasound simulation in the distal radius using clinical high-resolution peripheral-CT images.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to develop a novel ultrasound device to estimate bone mineral density (BMD) at the calcaneus. The device is entirely self-contained, portable (<or=1 kg) and handheld and permits real-time evaluation of the BMD by computing a parameter known as net time delay (NTD). The NTD is defined as the difference between the transit time through the heel of an ultrasound signal and the transit time through a hypothetical object of equal thickness (to the heel) but containing soft tissue only. This parameter is sensitive primarily to the total amount (i.e., the average total thickness) of bone contained in the propagation path, and thus is equivalent to the bone mineral content estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners, and to the (areal) BMD when normalized by transducer area. Computer simulations of ultrasound propagation were used to study the relationship between NTD and BMD. The simulations used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images of a set of 10 calcaneal bone cores, which were further processed by morphologic image processing to obtain a set of 30 "samples" with BMDs ranging from 0.25 to 1.83 g/cm2. The NTD and BMD were found to be very highly correlated (r=0.99), demonstrating the high sensitivity of NTD to bone mass. A clinical institutional review board-approved study measured 85 adult women at the heel. BMD was measured at the same time using DXA. A linear regression using NTD produced a linear correlation coefficient of 0.86, which represents a significant improvement over present ultrasound bone densitometers, but not nearly as good as the simulation results. Reasons for this have been identified (viz., errors in distance measurement and lack of coincidence between the DXA and ultrasound regions of interest), and a new device and experimental protocol to deal with these sources of error has been developed and is currently under clinical trials. It is expected that this should improve the correlation between NTD and BMD even further (>or=0.9), effectively making the former parameter a proxy for the latter. In conclusion, although X-ray methods are effective in bone mass assessment, osteoporosis remains one of the largest undiagnosed and under-diagnosed diseases in the world today. The research described here, in conjunction with the fact that the devices are designed to be manufactured at very low cost (approximately $400 USD), should enable the significant expansion of diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.