Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17586259›Full record

ReviewMethods in cell biology2007

Laser microsurgery in the GFP era: a cell biologist's perspective.

Valentin Magidson, Jadranka Loncarek, Polla Hergert, Conly L Rieder, Alexey Khodjakov

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in cell biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Coupling of microtubule bundles isolates them from local disruptions to set the structural stability of the anaphase spindle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Chemical tools for dissecting cell division.Nature chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Laser Scissors and Tweezers to Study Chromosomes: A Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optogenetic control of kinetochore function.Nature chemical biology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Microfluidic guillotine for single-cell wound repair studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Golgi as an MTOC: making microtubules for its own good.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2013
    Review
  17. Cell signaling experiments driven by optical manipulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentin MagidsonDivision of Molecular Medicine, Wadsworth Center, Albany, New York 12201, USA. valentin@wadsworth.org
Jadranka Loncarek
Polla Hergert
Conly L Rieder
Alexey Khodjakov
Wadsworth Center · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF CENTROSOMES IN SOMATIC CELLSR01GM059363 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI KHODJAKOV, ALEXEY L · 1999 to 2017
$6.3M
FORMATION,INTERACTION &FUNCTION OF SPINDLE COMPONENTSR37GM040198 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI RIEDER, CONLY L. · 2001 to 2010
$3.9M
FORMATION, INTERACTION, &FUNCTION OF SPINDLE COMPONENTSR01GM040198 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI RIEDER, CONLY L. · 1988 to 2000
$206k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM40198NIGMS NIH HHS GM59363NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM040198NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059363NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM040198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern biology is based largely on a reductionistic "dissection" approach-most cell biologists try to determine how complex biological systems work by removing their individual parts and studying the effects of this removal on the system. A variety of enzymatic and mechanical methods have been developed to dissect large cell assemblies like tissues and organs. Further, individual proteins can be inactivated or removed within a cell by genetic manipulations (e.g., RNAi or gene knockouts). However, there is a growing demand for tools that allow intracellular manipulations at the level of individual organelles. Laser microsurgery is ideally suited for this purpose and the popularity of this approach is on the rise among cell biologists. In this chapter, we review some of the applications for laser microsurgery at the subcellular level and describe practical requirements for laser microsurgery instrumentation demanded in the field. We also outline a relatively inexpensive but versatile laser microsurgery workstation that is being used in our laboratory. Our major thesis is that the limitations of the technology are no longer at the level of the laser, microscope, or software, but instead only in defining creative questions and in visualizing the target to be destroyed.

Indexed as

LasersAnimalsCellsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMicrosurgeryGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17586259
PMCPMC2570757
OpenAlexW1563895801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.