Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17584037›Full record

ReviewCurrent gene therapy2007

Current advances and future challenges in Adenoviral vector biology and targeting.

Samuel K Campos, Michael A Barry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current gene therapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Drug Development in Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Is on the Horizon?Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  10. Improving Molecular Therapy in the Kidney.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Viral Vector Systems for Gene Therapy: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Progress and Biosafety Challenges.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gene Therapy Tools for Brain Diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel K CamposDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Michael A Barry

Funding

Cell Targeting Ligands and Vectors for CLLR01CA093942 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BARRY, MICHAEL A · 2002 to 2005
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene delivery vectors based on Adenoviral (Ad) vectors have enormous potential for the treatment of both hereditary and acquired disease. Detailed structural analysis of the Ad virion, combined with functional studies has broadened our knowledge of the structure/function relationships between Ad vectors and host cells/tissues and substantial achievement has been made towards a thorough understanding of the biology of Ad vectors. The widespread use of Ad vectors for clinical gene therapy is compromised by their inherent immunogenicity. The generation of safer and more effective Ad vectors, targeted to the site of disease, has therefore become a great ambition in the field of Ad vector development. This review provides a synopsis of the structure/function relationships between Ad vectors and host systems and summarizes the many innovative approaches towards achieving Ad vector targeting.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAdenoviruses, HumanCapsid ProteinsGenetic TherapyHumansTransduction, GeneticVirus InternalizationCapsid Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17584037
PMCPMC2244792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.