Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17579968›Full record

ReviewJournal of analytical toxicology2007

Modern instrumental methods in forensic toxicology.

Michael L Smith, Shawn P Vorce, Justin M Holler, Eric Shimomura, Joe Magluilo, Aaron J Jacobs, Marilyn A Huestis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Quantum Dots as Biosensors in the Determination of Biochemical Parameters in Xenobiotic Exposure and Toxins.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael L SmithDivision of Forensic Toxicology, Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.
Shawn P Vorce
Justin M Holler
Eric Shimomura
Joe Magluilo
Aaron J Jacobs
Marilyn A Huestis

Funding

Detection Of Drugs Of Abuse In Biological Fluids/TissuesZ01DA000412 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI HUESTIS, MARILYN · 1998 to 2008
$956k
PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF DRUGS OF ABUSEZ01DA000414 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI HUESTIS, MARILYN A · 1998 to 2008
$373k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000412Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews modern analytical instrumentation in forensic toxicology for identification and quantification of drugs and toxins in biological fluids and tissues. A brief description of the theory and inherent strengths and limitations of each methodology is included. The focus is on new technologies that address current analytical limitations. A goal of this review is to encourage innovations to improve our technological capabilities and to encourage use of these analytical techniques in forensic toxicology practice.

Indexed as

Chemistry Techniques, AnalyticalChromatography, GasChromatography, LiquidElectrophoresis, CapillaryForensic ToxicologyHumansMass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID17579968
PMCPMC2745311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.